June 2023

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nexters. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 21:37, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: GDEV (May 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vrxces were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
VRXCES (talk) 12:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Anton Ladovir! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! VRXCES (talk) 12:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:GDEV has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:GDEV. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 20:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello Ian! I have read all the rules and follow them clearly! I can confidently assure you that I have no conflict of interest with GDEV. Thank you very much for your message! Anton Ladovir (talk) 13:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

August 2024

edit
 

Hello Anton Ladovir. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:GDEV, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Anton Ladovir. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Anton Ladovir|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. C F A 💬 21:52, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Dear CFA! Thanks for you comments about my GDEV draft page. I work in GDEV Holding as PR manager and just want to create this page on Wikipedia. If whole my text is ok then I just kindly ask you to be so kind to approve this article. If I should delete any sentences because they are promoting our company - of course I will do. I also put here link with my LinkedIn profile to proof my long distance work in this company and proof that I haven't any pay from GDEV company as paid editor. https://www.linkedin.com/in/anton-ladovir-a0381967/
I hope this helps finally put our article on air or I wait any comments from you which I will fix for sure.
Thanks in advance CFA! Anton Ladovir (talk) 22:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: GDEV (August 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
C F A 💬 21:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply