Antonell 1983

Welcome!

Hello, Antonell 1983, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like TXT e-solutions, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:48, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

TXT e-solutions

Hi, I noticed you altered the Italian TXT e-solutions article in the line of the way I altered the English article here. I would like to help you improve this article some more, but I do need your help. I think the current state of the article is a good start, but it (urgently) needs work. Articles like this tend to be speedy deleted later on when ever one feels like it... and then there is nobody to blame. The article is in need of more reliable third party sources, and the (notable) stories about TXT should be represented here if possible. See also Wikipedia:Reliable sources. You can also email me if you want (you can use the email option in the toolbox left on my userpage). Then we can discuss this some more. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 17:03, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi Marcel, I would have like to send you an email but i'm just a beginner with wikipedia and i haven't spotted the right link yet. Anyway, I really appreciate your help and advice. I added some links about international projects. Hope it will work:)

Hi, thanks for your respons. The intention of your new effort was good. But you have to be aware of the right tone. (For me as a not-native speaker this is a big problem as well.) Now I think the article is still in the danger zone... The best way to secure the article get some work done soon. I think almost the whole article needs to be rewritten. I thin a good example here is the Ansaldo STS. I will explain more soon. One question: Where did you get the information about the history of TXT? -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 00:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

I have reduced and rewritten the article some more... and hope this will do for now. I would advice you to read this article as well. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 01:06, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

P.S. I took the liberty of creating an archive here on your talkpage, There is no need to keep looking at these warnings if you can archive them all the same

Hi, I've taken the history information from the annual report '06 http://www.txtgroup.com/content/maincontent/4774/C_4_maincontent_4774_gr_content_mrkt_download_object.pdf but as you suggest i will try to rewrite it as a text and not as a list. I've made few change in the text to be in line with the information on the web site.

Hi. I referted those changes as I explained below. I will take a look at that annual report, and get back on that. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 16:07, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

P.S. A companies website is considered to be one of the most irreliable source.

Original research

Ok. I guess you think you know better removing the improvements I made. Now I referted you because it seems like original research to me, read Wikipedia:No original research.

I guess you don't understand that every pace of information should rely on notable sources. If you start adding different text, you should at least add a source. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 16:06, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

You most likely an employee of TXT e-solutions and most likely have a Conflict of interest, read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Because of that it is better not to edit the article, but stick to responding on the talkpage.

In stead of that you didn'ty respond, but started removing the improvement I made. I would advice you not to continu in this way. I am prepared to help, but if you continue I will have you blocked all the same. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 16:06, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Some more explanation

Hi Antonell. I explained some more about my recent changes on the article talkpage, see Talk:TXT e-solutions. Next time you comment, please sign your post with four tildes (~~~~) and the program automatically makes a signature. Good luck. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 21:11, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Commercial links

Hi, the new references you added to the article are hardly considered reliable sources, and I would advice you not to add more of those links... Or in other words. Next time I will remove them all. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 14:05, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

wich one? I'm just trying to find other web pages speaking about TXT (Antonell 1983 (talk) 14:47, 11 September 2009 (UTC))

The reference from "Microsoft Case Studies" and "Manufacturing & Logistics IT". These kind of web pages are hardly ever considered to be reliable sources, and I (or others) tend to remove them sooner or later. One example is the Zachman Framework article. The version on year ago, see here contained almost only this kind of links. Eventually I rewrote the whole article and removed most of them.

If you want to search for reliable sources, use Google Books or Google Sholar. However, personally I think the article looks fine at the moment. I would just leave it for now. Maybe you can focus on writing an new article about TXT's most notable product.

One other thing. Maybe you think I am a bit harsh on you, but in the long term I think this is for the best. In Wikipedia these articles about smaller companies often considered to be just advertisements. Editors can always propose to delete them, and then there is often still little you can do. So the trick I use is not to draw to much attention. Keep it simple and uphold the highest standards. I hope for the best that this will appreciate this in the end. --Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 15:10, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

I never thought you've being harsh, but I've really appreciated your help and advice. I will try to update the italian version following your guidelines. thank you so much (Antonell 1983 (talk) 15:32, 11 September 2009 (UTC))

Ok thank you. I have no experience with the Italian Wikipedia. Every Wikipedia has developed own specific guidelines... regarding this kind of articles. I guess you are on your own their. Good luck. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 19:57, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem: TXT e-solutions

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as TXT e-solutions, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.txtgroup.com/content/maincontent/4774/C_4_maincontent_4774_gr_content_mrkt_download_object.pdf, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:TXT e-solutions and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, TXT e-solutions, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:TXT e-solutions with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:TXT e-solutions. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:TXT e-solutions saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Mdd (talk) 19:20, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of TXT e-solutions

The article TXT e-solutions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is not only has a lot of problems. Beside it's place in the Borsa Italiana, the subject seems hardly notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mdd (talk) 22:24, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of EXact learning solutions

The article EXact learning solutions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article on topic with no established notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ian Spackman (talk) 15:47, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo-txt2righe.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo-txt2righe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 16 March 2016 (UTC)