Antonia Tejeda Barros

Welcome!

Hello, Antonia Tejeda Barros, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! KGirlTrucker81 ^{talk what I'm been doing} 12:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

September 2018

Hello, I'm Uncle Milty. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Woody Allen sexual assault allegation have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Do not add external links to blogs, and DO NOT add external links to your own blogs to Wikipedia. | Uncle Milty | talk | 04:14, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Antonia Tejeda Barros. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Antonia Tejeda Barros. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

September 2019

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. El_C 15:24, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

May 2020

Hello, I'm I grieve in stereo. I noticed that you recently removed content from Apropos of Nothing without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I grieve in stereo (talk) 23:06, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Apropos of Nothing. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. I grieve in stereo (talk) 21:52, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Warning

Hello, Antonia Tejeda Barros. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.--Asqueladd (talk) 17:47, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello: I have edited the page Love Gets a Room (movie) not to promote anybody, just to add the whole main cast in the right order. It's really unfair that you have deleted all the info. Therefore, I have added it again. Please keep it. The cast is now correct. Thank you very much. Many greetings from Madrid / Antonia Antonia Tejeda Barros (talk) 13:52, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Yes you are. You are promoting a relative (moreover, an underage relative). You can't fool me.--Asqueladd (talk) 13:56, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Please stay away from editing about that person without disclosing your conflict of interest.--Asqueladd (talk) 13:58, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Don't be ridiculous. I'm editing 2 pages where I know a lot about the films, since I was on set. The info I'm providing is relevant and interesting. You are harming Wikipedia. You are Spanish, right? Are you bored? Stay away from my editing. Thanks. Antonia Tejeda Barros (talk) 13:59, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

I won't. You are adding an actor with an unreliable source (the reviews of the film in that place attests that the whole family is cheering that underage actor). You are unduly influenced by your connections to that actor and you are the one harming Wikipedia. If you don't take a step back, I will take your case to the administrator's noticeboard (and I have plenty of material, believe me), and you will probably end up blocked.--Asqueladd (talk) 14:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

I understand your froustration (some people create, other destroy). You are the only one here who is (with this behavior) promoting actors/actresses. IMDb is the MOST reliable source in cinema (worldwide). If you don't know that known fact, that's not my problem. My contribution to these 2 pages (El buen patrón & Love Gets a Room) is crucial, necessary, interesting and important. I added all the main cast of these 2 movies in the right order, with references, and that took a lot of time and dedication. Stay away from my editing. Furthermore, your threatening is really ugly and your attitude very aggressive. I really hope that the administrators take action against your destructive behavior (reverting and reverting and reverting editing that ads very valuable information, and creating an ugly & tense atmosphere in Wikipedia). Many greetings / Antonia Antonia Tejeda Barros (talk) 14:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

You can find this to be of your interest.--Asqueladd (talk) 14:34, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. --Asqueladd (talk) 14:38, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

We require reliable sources, particularly for articles on living persons

There is a long-standing consensus here at Wikipedia that the Internet Movie Data Base or IMDb is not a reliable source, as it can be edited by anybody. I know that the entries for myself and my daughter were both entered by me, and not fact-checked by anybody (even though I was scrupulous about only entering information I knew to be accurate). --Orange Mike | Talk 15:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

OK. That's not a problem. I have added references from Screen Daily and the 19 Festival de Sevilla too. I have many other references that I could add, to "prove" the cast, but I really don't think that will be necessary. Thanks. Antonia Tejeda Barros (talk) 15:16, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Per WP:V it is necessary to provide citations for content that has been or is likely to be questioned. Wikipedia cares less about whatever is true and more about what we can independently verify. While I understand your frustration, your poor attitude and tendency to ignore what you've been told is only going to result in more heartburn for you. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) Chris Troutman (talk) 23:29, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

I don't have any heartburn. Only care for cinema, philosophy, music, and the Holocaust, and I'm happy to help Wikipedia giving my time and dedication to edit entries (I have edited many entries). When I meet "angry" editors who only make the work of others 100 times harder, it's normal I get disappointed. This attitude harms the Wikipedia community. Thanks & greetings Antonia Tejeda Barros (talk) 07:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Zero^talk 14:13, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Reminder, per above notice and WP:ARBECR, your edits are confined to the making of straightforward edit requests at article talk pages, nothing more. Thank you.Selfstudier (talk) 11:31, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Notice of intention to report

Right after being informed of the rules, you broke them at 1920 Nebi Musa riots. I will give you a short time to revert yourself. If you don't, I will propose that you are blocked. In fact, given the unacceptable personal attack in your edit summary, I may report you anyway. Zero^talk 12:33, 27 August 2024 (UTC)