User talk:Aoidh/Archives/2020

Proposed deletion of SMART HDD

The article SMART HDD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 02:12, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of SMART HDD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SMART HDD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMART HDD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 23:27, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Please undo the deletion of Netcomics (it is an established manwha and webtoon company) with citation proof on pages Manwha and Webtoon

Hello Aoidh,

thank you for watching over Wikipedia.

Unfortunately, Netcomics from the U.S. gets deleted constantly from the pages Manhwa and Webtoon although they are an established manhwa and webtoon company. Citation proof was provided. They are a big company with a website and app. They collaborate with Lezhin. And Lezhin is mentioned on the Wikipedia sites Manhwa and Webtoon. But for some reason, the addition of Netcomics is marked as spam. The company is not spam. And the mentioning of them in Wikipedia is also not spam.

The two citation links are: 1) https://bookriot.com/2018/10/25/best-manga-reader-sites-and-apps/ 2) https://www.anime-planet.com/users/Grizz/lists/official-english-translations-by-netcomi-133066

Their website is: https://www.netcomics.com/ Their app is: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.netcomics.app&hl=en and https://apps.apple.com/us/app/netcomics-webtoon-manga/id1401100831

How can I insert their company without being deleted?

I thought that 2 citations would be enough.

Regards, Maria

Maria97531 (talk) 12:05, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

"Template:Uw-bdp" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Uw-bdp. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Uw-bdp redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:30, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Uw-ewsoft

Template:Uw-ewsoft has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:19, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Uw-ewsoft

Template:Uw-ewsoft has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mz7 (talk) 07:46, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Kids (film)

Why did you erase all of my information? I worked really hard on that. And that’s valid information. I got from watching interviews and reading an article from the New York Times celebrating the films 20th anniversary. Why did you erase all of my information? Thesmlo99z (talk) 20:21, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Because it's unsourced and includes weasel words that are too vague. "It is now regarded as a milestone of 90s filmmaking" by whom? And is this a viewpoint that is widely held? If so that's quite a claim and would require significant sources to verify it. If it's valid information, take it to the talk page and show sources and verify this. - Aoidh (talk) 20:24, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Are you dumb or something? What do you mean by whom? I already told you. The film is a cult classic and is considered to be a milestone of 90s independent filmmaking. I got this line from an article published by the New York Times celebrating the films 20th anniversary. And Jonah hill did say it was an influence on his film mid90s. He said it in multiple interviews. I saw it myself. And Eminem does reference it on a song of his. Look it up. I don’t have to show you anything. And my information has weasel words? Your whole article is horrible. Listen I’m sorry if what I wrote didn’t live up to you standards, but you don’t have to be rude about it. I worked really hard on getting that information. Thesmlo99z (talk) 09:29, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

The issue, again, is that it has to be attributed and verified by sources. The article cannot just say it is regarded without saying who regards it as such. Without such clarification, and without reliable sources, the information cannot be placed into the lede of the article as if it is a universal fact. To clarify, these are not my standards, these are Wikipedia standards. - Aoidh (talk) 20:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Bitcoin XT/Core article deletion discussion

Hi, I saw you commented on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin-Qt. Would you like to also express your opinion on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin Core and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin XT and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin Improvement Proposal? --Ysangkok (talk) 17:16, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Your input is requested

I have an RfC going on at Talk:Gwar#RfC_about_GwarBar_vs_GWARbar regarding using all caps in an article and would appreciate the input of some long-standing Wikipedia editors who may be familiar with the policy. Thanks for your time! NJZombie (talk) 04:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Regarding Vanniyar

Hi! Mentioning notable people does need a Wikipedia Article on them. If so under what policy or guideline, can you please refer it.--Universalrahu (talk) 01:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

If you believe that these people are notable enough to be included, then write the article on them. Wikipedia articles are not phone book directories or similar items; it is not sufficient to verify that someone merely exists. Notable people need to have notability shown. - Aoidh (talk) 01:35, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Do you mean every notable people who are listed must have Wikipedia page on them? Some people are notable to some particular field. Everyone doesn't have wikipedia page even though they are more notable than anyother in Wikipedia already. The essay you quoted says "Wikipedia editors should write a new article before they create links to that article in list pages.." In my case I don't create any link other than mentioning their name. I can also see some pages like Kerala people's where all listed names do no have a page on them. Thank you.--Universalrahu (talk) 17:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

What matters is that notability is shown for people if you're putting them in a list called Notable People. Whether you wikilink the name or not does not matter. - Aoidh (talk) 19:48, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Mark WikiProject Linux as inactive?

Hi! I was directed to your talk page by the participants list on WikiProject Linux. I've started a discussion whether we can keep it running, or mark it as inactive.– Abuluntu ( talk 06:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)