Trivial Content

edit

Please don't create pages with trivial content. `'mikka 09:33, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Spamming Ads for Website

edit

A tag has been placed on Interpretes y Traductores Salamanca, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Turlo Lomon 11:27, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


A tag has been placed on Learning Spanish, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Turlo Lomon 11:28, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sourcing

edit

Please include citations in future posts. Also if you could revise the Xylotheque page to include the sources of your data that would be appreciated. If you do not do so I'm going to have to remove those points. Also your article seems to plagiarize blatantly other wiki sites about the same topic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.187.190.88 (talk) 00:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

ARGUS FP7 project

edit
 

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of ARGUS FP7 project, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.projectargus.eu/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 21:38, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply