This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Apbiologyrocks (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I will no longer use sockpuppets for forbidden purposes. I understand what I did wrong. You can checkuser me regularly to ensure that this promise is adhered to. If needed, I will pursue mentorship and or rehab to get my editing back on track

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This block was again reviewed on IRC in #wikipedia-en-unblock, and was declined, as the user is still operating multiple accounts with User:British Airways is great. Hersfold (t/a/c) 22:43, 3 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Apbiologyrocks (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I will no longer use sockpuppets for forbidden purposes, such as trolling I understand what I did wrong. You can checkuser me regularly to ensure that this promise is adhered to. If needed, I will pursue mentorship and or rehab to get my editing back on track. I intend to join the Meteorology WikiProject if unblocked.

Decline reason:

Pass. You've had your fun, move on.Kuru (talk) 03:44, 15 May 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin: most recent self-admitted sock for this account appears to be User:The mro44ors in walestrytry, less than a month ago. I'd recommend a minimum of year away from Wikipedia before User:Zsfgseg is considered for unblock. --jpgordon::==( o ) 01:36, 15 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

July 2015

edit

I have just received a Wiki-sent email from this user with the message "I am back" - the relevant headers:

Received: from [2620:0:861:101:862b:2bff:fe77:e616] (port=38776 helo=mw1021.eqiad.wmnet)
 by polonium.wikimedia.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82)
 (envelope-from <wiki-enwiki-5ys0-nrhlnh-GRpmGXBU2tm0E2H6@wikimedia.org>)
  id 1ZF3Tq-0005iT-5A
  for [withheld]; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:54:54 +0000
Received: from www-data by mw1021.eqiad.wmnet with local (Exim 4.82)
 (envelope-from <wiki-enwiki-5ys0-nrhlnh-GRpmGXBU2tm0E2H6@wikimedia.org>)
 id 1ZF3Tq-0001Hs-1v
  for [withheld]; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:54:54 +0000
To: Phantomsteve
Subject: Zsfgseg
From: Apbiologyrocks <wakeman123@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:54:53 +0000
Message-ID: <enwiki.55a53eddbfde31.62052444@en.wikipedia.org>
Content preview:  I am back. -- This email was sent by user "Apbiologyrocks"
   on the English Wikipedia to user "Phantomsteve". It has been automatically
   delivered and the Wikimedia Foundation cannot be held responsible for its
   contents. [...]

... Just in case anyone was interested. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 23:10, 14 July 2015 (UTC)Reply