Applegeeks

August 2017

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to La La Land (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: La La Land (film) was changed by Applegeeks (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888087 on 2017-08-23T16:22:29+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Applegeeks, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Applegeeks! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Applegeeks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe an admin (User:Callanecc) thought that we were related to a previously banned account, User:BurritoSlayer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/BurritoSlayer Originally, User:GSF 323, User:KindleReader, and User:Biker1932 and I (all friends in real life) decided that we'd edit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajat_Bhageria together after reading one of his Forbes articles. However, because we had all started editing articles at the same time, we were accused of being sockpuppets and part of the User:BurritoSlayer farm. Seems like an admin did a CU and found that we were related (we are friends...but not related to Bhageria) but couldn't find a connection to BurritoSlayer. Well that's because there isn't one....We are not in any way related to BurritoSlayer. But still we had our accounts banned and are !votes not counted on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rajat_Bhageria_(3rd_nomination). This really isn't fair. It's like convicting someone to jail without any true evidence. We know we're young to Wikipedia and haven't edited too many articles but that doesn't mean we're socks to BurritoSlayer!. We've been part of collateral damage of the BurritoSlayer sock farms and now it seems like User:TonyBallioni et. al. think that we're related to BurritoSlayer and want to delete Bhageria's article under G5 (which is again not true...and also the article it meets WP: GNG). We'd like to continue editing and adding to the community and would appreciate if you could unblock us :)

Decline reason:

A checkuser found that you were indeed socking, with the accounts you all have linked to each other. Even without the link to BurritoSlayer, this si still a checkuser block, with proof of multiple accounts being linked to one another. Also, the edits on the AfD are a good indication that there was socking going on as well. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:50, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Add topic