Archaeo2

Welcome!

Hello, Archaeo2, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kadruva, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - MrX 20:17, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Avid reader of religious literature, Full-time Finance professional, Part-time archeologist, Photography enthusiast and staunch follower of the ultimate truth.

Archaeo2, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Archaeo2!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi Play The Wikipedia Adventure This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:22, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

September 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Deepika Padukone; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. I would also strongly recommend going through WP:STATUSQUO and WP:BLP. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 20:05, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Archaeo2 reported by User:Krimuk2.0 (Result: ). Thank you. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 20:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Krimuk2.0, no offence but I should probably mention that you were technically edit warring too. Although, it's arguably exempted under WP:3RRBLP since the two accounts are introducing POV sections in a BLP. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 20:23, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing indefinitely for checkuser  Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:44, 22 September 2020 (UTC)