Welcome!

edit

Hello, ArcticDragonfly, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Gap9551 (talk) 01:34, 8 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your help desk question

edit

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:26, 24 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Power

edit

Hallo,

adding DIN-PS to German vehicles doesn't make sense in every case, basically, it depends on the time the car was made. Since 1978, DIN-PS is officially obsolete in Germany as well as Austria and must not be used anymore. In the German language Wikipedia, each pre-1978-vehicle made in the BRD or Austria usually goes by PS (kW), while each post-1978 vehicle goes by kW. Same for kp·m and N·m. Therefore, there is no need to add historical units to modern vehicles. I would only add it to articles on historical vehicles if the information given by historical sources is in historical units. The problem with historical metric units (PS, kp, etc.) is widely misunderstood in the English language Wikipedia and I have given up on explaining it. I would not recommend trying that again since a) the native English users here usually don't even know that historical metric units exist and b) their horizont is very limited. I tried adding the kilopondmetre to the template convert and correct wrong unit symbols without success. The "experts" here would not even notice if they see something weird regarding DIN-PS / hp / bhp and even after carefully checking the sources, they would still add wrong information because they don't understand what they are doing (for instance: here). Also, explaining the difference between PS and hp, and that readers would confuse those two units since the PS value is widely used even if it is often mistranslated into hp in English will be ignored. Before I forget that: Never add cm3 to vehicle articles, the "experts" here dislike it. They don't (want to) understand that each non-American uses SI-units. Best regards, --Jojhnjoy (talk) 12:22, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Jojhnjoy:
Yea, I guess I'll have to just check the German wiki (even if I don't understand much German) to quickly get the power values actually used around the Internet for German cars. Since the manufacturers' webpages are quite bad, slow and every language have a different layout. BMW F10 even had PS in the article for more than 6 years until it was removed. I don't think anyone even tried to remove it.
I noticed that quite many languages just translated PS to hp instead of actually changing the value, like the UK, French, Spanish and Swedish BMW sites. Same thing in my country. It would be nice if other countries followed Australia and New Zealand and just used kW.
But oh well, you can't always win. ArcticDragonfly (talk) 22:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Well, actually, only the United States have horsepower. However, even though in Europe SI-units must be used by law, people that don't work with engines or vehicles on a daily basis (or "enthusiasts", etc.) would still use PS (PS = pk, hk, CV, Л.С. KS, KM, etc.) The problems with the insufficent layout for vehicle engine power in the English language Wikipedia depends on the authors. Instead of choosing something that actually fits the topic, they would choose what they prefer → that's why you would find hp in articles on German vehicles in this Wikipedia even though approximately 70 % of the English speaking people worldwide don't know that 1 hp equals ≈745.7 W. And unfortunately, a lot of authors here (especially those who have never seen SI-units) don't know how to deal with SI and historical metric units. I had a discussion about manufacturer claims – in Germany and Austria, vehicles were DIN-70020 rated and everybody knows that there aren't many options to fake the actual output. This means, a DIN rating is very accurate, even if it's a manufacturer claim. (The manufacturers say that their vehicle X has 100 kW and engineers of the German federal trafic agency check whether this claim makes sense or not; if it does not, the car wouldn't become street legal in Germany and customers had to write an engineer report every time they would want to register a car (And that is very complicated).) But apparently, some authors don't want want that to be true, instead, they wanted to use rwhp. I had never heard of rwhp before; it means that you put the car on a dyno and measure the torque the wheels transmit to the dyno to make a horsepower rating out of it. In Germany, people would say Wer misst, misst Mist (The one who measures would always measure bullshit). I hope I don't have to explain it too much, but measuring a car on a dyno would never be accurate: Consider different measuring conditions, different dynos, engine wear, different tyres and that measuring the wheel horsepower doesn't meant that you are measuring the engine power. Not to mention that only Americans use horsepower. That's why I have never seen anything like a rwhp rating in any serious book on automobiles. Scientists and specialist authors don't use it because it is crap. I seriously belive that you could hardly find valid sources for a good rwhp rating for any car. In my opinion, those ratings are rather original research. Anyways, best regards, --Jojhnjoy (talk) 09:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, ArcticDragonfly. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tuska Open Air Metal Festival, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gojira and Body Count (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, ArcticDragonfly. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, ArcticDragonfly. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

BattleBots 2019

edit

While not a reliable source, a total of 55 teams (and counting) were confirmed to compete this year, even though the show itself hasn't announced a new season yet. 24.42.2.106 (talk) 02:49, 30 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

It's also revealed to air on June 7. You might wanna check their Twitter to see their official release date. 24.42.2.106 (talk) 20:43, 3 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Finnish maritime cluster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freedom of the Seas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 13 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of largest ferries of Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 28 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply