Arcussenilis
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Arcussenilis. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Arcussenilis. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of William d'Évreux for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article William d'Évreux is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William d'Évreux until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Agricolae (talk) 16:18, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Arcussenilis. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Arcussenilis. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editA barnstar for you!
editThe Barnstar of Diligence | |
Your work on the articles for various members of the Devereux family is extremely detailed and very well sourced. It is a very impressive body of work that deserves recognition! Monsieurdl mon talk 20:41, 1 January 2022 (UTC) |
Walter Devereux and son Walter Devereux
editI'm currently doing some research on the Devereux line on WikiTree and correcting what apparently is a conflation of two Walter Devereux males, father and son. Your work here makes it extremely easy to compile high quality sources for this effort and I greatly appreciate it! Monsieurdl mon talk 20:45, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Stephen Devereux Grant by Gilbert de Lacy Reference?
editIn the Stephen Devereux page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Devereux) the statement "To secure his position in Hereford, Stephen Devereux accepted a grant from Gilbert de Lacy of 12 virgates of land in the manor of Staunton-on-Wye" doesn't have a reference.
It would be a surprise for the grant of land to be in Staunton on Wye as although the de Lacy family held this place (on and off), it was not held in demesne. Stanton Lacy is Shropshire would be more likely. I have seen other claims that the land was in Staunton on Wye and would like to see a conclusive reference, so would be interested in the reference to Stephen Devereux's charter.
I have a C14th copy of the original charter and the evidence from that strongly suggests Stanton Lacy. NortonCanonicorum (talk) 17:43, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- I think your point is good, and agree with that change. Thanks Arcussenilis (talk) 01:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- The issue is fully discussed in https://www.modellinghistory.com/sow/hca/hca_deeds_3226_3249_v1_4.pdf if you need a reference. The place is conclusively Stanton Lacy, and the paper traces the origin of the Staunton on Wye misapplication. NortonCanonicorum (talk) 08:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- I found a reference in one of my other sources and made the correction. Appreciate the additional reference. Thanks again. Arcussenilis (talk) 03:19, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- The issue is fully discussed in https://www.modellinghistory.com/sow/hca/hca_deeds_3226_3249_v1_4.pdf if you need a reference. The place is conclusively Stanton Lacy, and the paper traces the origin of the Staunton on Wye misapplication. NortonCanonicorum (talk) 08:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)