Arefin sazzad

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nuski Baby (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nuski Baby and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nuski Baby, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Arefin sazzad! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 08:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Nuski Baby

I strongly suggest that you read the requirements of WP:NMUSICIAN, particularly the need to demonstrate that she has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician herself.

The majority of the references that you have cited are unreliable and not independent. For example Factmandu, which the entire draft article appears to based upon, is not a reliable source. The Factmandu article is written by an anonymous author, 'Alex', and there does not appear to be any independent editorial oversight or collaborating citations. As I also indicated social media web sites, such as Facebook and Instagram, are not acceptable or reliable sources either. Interviews (such as Exclusive interview with Nuski Baby), press releases and articles written by the individual are all primary sources and can't be used without collaborating references.

Statements such as "Nuski gains the Grammy Nomination in 2017" need to be properly sourced with reliable references. I have checked the cited reference Billboard magazine which does mention her at all.

In addition you need to reference the article property, to help I recommend that you read Wikipedia's guide to referencing for beginners.

Lastly you need to write the article in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article, in a neutral point of view - avoid puffery and peacock terms, such as "her music has sky rocketed to the top", "Nunu’s music genius", "marvelous to see her drive as well as determination reach chart topping success", "artist continues to prove others wrong", "has come a long way and she all over the radio", and "she had to do all her stuff by herself ". Dan arndt (talk) 02:10, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Arefin sazzad/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Arefin sazzad/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 04:58, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Nuski Baby has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nuski Baby. Thanks! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 20:57, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nuski Baby (June 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by MapleSoy was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Promotional article that includes false information (e.g., a Grammy award) and uses faked references (e.g., a Medium blog post masquerading as Billboard).

MapleSoy (talk) 03:47, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Nusky Baby, from its old location at User:Arefin sazzad/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 14:17, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Nusky Baby has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nusky Baby. Thanks! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 14:20, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nusky Baby

A tag has been placed on Draft:Nusky Baby requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G11 - 'Promotional article that includes false information (e.g., a Grammy award) and uses faked references (e.g., a Medium blog post masquerading as Billboard).'

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 14:33, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:26, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

• Using multiple accounts to fabricate sources in order to get your promotional article published is pretty much the most blockable thing you can do on Wikipedia.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:33, 17 June 2020 (UTC)