Arifjwadder

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eco-Club, Aligarh Muslim University (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eco-Club, Aligarh Muslim University.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for
your contributions
to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Arifjwadder, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eco-Club, Aligarh Muslim University (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eco-Club, Aligarh Muslim University.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Samwalton9 (talk) 11:56, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

References

Speedy deletion nomination of Assam Association of Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh

Hello Arifjwadder,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Assam Association of Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. R!j!n (talk) 11:12, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 27 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Aligarh Muslim University page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eco-Club, Aligarh Muslim University concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eco-Club, Aligarh Muslim University, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eco-Club, Aligarh Muslim University

Hello Arifjwadder. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Eco-Club, Aligarh Muslim University".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eco-Club, Aligarh Muslim University}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Filmsaaz

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Filmsaaz, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://filmclub.amu.ac.in/filmsaaz/8th_2015/index.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:15, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

University Film Club, Aligarh Muslim University

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of University Film Club, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh., and it appears to include material copied directly from http://filmclub.amu.ac.in/about_us.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:30, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of University Film Club, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh.

Hello Arifjwadder,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged University Film Club, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh. for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ormr2014 (talk) 23:01, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

University Film Club, Aligarh Muslim University

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of University Film Club, Aligarh Muslim University, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: University Film Club, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh.. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:15, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Eco-Club, Aligarh Muslim University

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Eco-Club, Aligarh Muslim University, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://ecoclub.amu.ac.in/about%20us.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:49, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eco-Club, Aligarh Muslim University

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eco-Club, Aligarh Muslim University requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Animalparty-- (talk) 14:10, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Arifjwadder, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Animalparty-- (talk) 14:31, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Please also read about notability. Article subjects must have significant third-party coverage to remain in Wikipedia, no matter how noble their cause. --Animalparty-- (talk) 14:34, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Eco-Club, Aligarh Muslim University, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. --Animalparty-- (talk) 17:58, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eco-Club, Aligarh Muslim University

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eco-Club, Aligarh Muslim University requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Animalparty-- (talk) 18:00, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Arifjwadder. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Animalparty-- (talk) 18:01, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Category:Clubs and Societies of the Aligarh Muslim University

Category:Clubs and Societies of the Aligarh Muslim University, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 10:41, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Filmsaaz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Filmsaaz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filmsaaz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 11:22, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of University Film Club, Aligarh Muslim University for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article University Film Club, Aligarh Muslim University is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University Film Club, Aligarh Muslim University until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 11:24, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Law Society, Aligarh Muslim University for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Law Society, Aligarh Muslim University is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law Society, Aligarh Muslim University until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 11:26, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Aligarh Muslim University Students' Union for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aligarh Muslim University Students' Union is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aligarh Muslim University Students' Union until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 11:32, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Aligarh Muslim University

He is quite entitled to nominate them for deletion if he thinks there is a good reason. Other editors, such as yourself, can explain why at the page linked from each article as to how they comply with Wikipedia policy. You should remember not to make disparaging remarks about other editors. That sort of thing will lead to your blocking. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:31, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Non-Resident Students' Centre and our requirements for a stand alone article

Hello!

You have just reinserted an article for Non-Resident Students' Centre. However, that content does not meet our requirements for a stand alone article . Please revert yourself or begin providing a lot of sources not connected with the school that discuss the student center in detail. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:45, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Non-Resident Students' Centre

The article Non-Resident Students' Centre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of significant coverage in reliably third party sources, merely the club's newsletters and self published homages

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 00:55, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Repost of University Film Club, Aligarh Muslim University

A tag has been placed on University Film Club, Aligarh Muslim University requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:44, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

You bear the responsiblity

When you claim that there are reliably published sources that cover a subject in depth, it is your responsibility to provide those sources - not tell someone else "You go find them". -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:16, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Our requirements are that reliably sourced, third parties have covered the subject in depth and not just passing mention. Of the reliable sources, there is one that is just a headline [1], one the is a regurgitated press release calling for submissions that does not cover the actual event because it was from before the event occurred [2], one that mentions in passing that a particular film had screened at the event [3]. None of that establishes notability. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:22, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:46, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:59, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 7th Filmsaaz (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:7th Filmsaaz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:29, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 7th Filmsaaz (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Seahorseruler was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:7th Filmsaaz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Seahorseruler ^{(Talk Page) (Contribs)} 08:28, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Immortals (documentary film)

The article The Immortals (documentary film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILMS. No claims of notability made.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:02, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Baharul Islam

Thank you for your edit to List of former justices of the Supreme Court of India adding Baharul Islam. Unfortunately, your edit did not use the correct senority number for Baharul Islam, which was #48, instead you created your own number (150). You did not actually state an archival copy of the url in your citation, you just repeated the base url. Web pages are archived at places such as WebCite or Internet Archive. You might want to read those two articles to better understand the archiving process. You also might want to look at the essay WP:Link rot. Wiki tables can be difficult to understand. Fortunately, Help:Table provides additional information about formatting tables. Before adding to a table be sure you know how each entry is formatted. You can check your work using the "Preview" button, to see if you got it right. In this case your edit left out the "|-" that separates individual records so that Baharul Islam was included at the end of #149 instead of as a separate entry. I have fixed these problems for List of former justices of the Supreme Court of India. --Bejnar (talk) 07:10, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Non-Resident Students' Centre ‎, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

What don't you understand?

What is so hard for you to understand about the fact that Wikipedia has articles about subjects that third parties have written about and that it is not a free advertising platform to be a substitute website for the University??? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:23, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

There are third party articles written about this article. The only thing is that one needs some time to search such article on internet. Moreover, you will find internet material hard to get for a institute which is very old. In India everything has not been digitized, so we also must take into consideration of that also. Also a central university does not need any promotional stuff from Wikipedia. In the instant case I am pretty much sure that it is a very old centre and very important part of the university. Third party articles in the form of hard copy are abundant about this centre.Arifjwadder (talk) 12:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

You have not presented a single third party reliable source discussing the NRI center in depth. and that has been a pattern about all of the AU articles that you have been editing. We do not make exceptions because reliable sources have not been digitized. We do not care that you think " it is a very old centre and very important part of the university." we care that you are able to document that third parties care. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:39, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

There were citation (s) if I recall at the first hand before you edited in the month of June, 2015 if I am not wrong. Please see the version dated May, 2015. Arifjwadder (talk) 17:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

It is a good idea to get your reliable sources first, and then make your edits citing those sources, rather than making edits and hoping that you can find sources later. Citing to hard-copy, paper-based, versions of reliable sources is fine, so long as they are properly identified so that others can find them also (see WP:Citing sources), and so long as the sources clearly support the edit. It is important that such hard-copy, paper-based, sources be published, so that they have been through the editorial fact-checking process and so that copies are located in more than one place. See also WP:Identifying reliable sources. So availablity in hard copy only is not an excuse for failing to provide citations to independent reliable sources. --Bejnar (talk) 17:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

There were citations of several books till May, 2015, but those has been deleted. Arifjwadder (talk) 17:28, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

as far as I can tell, the "sources" in the old version were published by the University [4] - not third parties. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

not at all. University does not publish anything in Wikipedia. I clearly recall that there were many citations of books and journals before you redirected it. Arifjwadder (talk) 18:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

I did not say the University was publishing anything on Wikipedia ( there are swarms of SPAs doing that). What I did say is that the sources in the version you claim has citations were published by those affiliated with the school and thus not third party notice which is the required standard for a stand alone article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

You are again mistaken. The publications which I can see is totally independent from the University. Google for Ibn Sina Academy which published some books, has no connection with the university.Arifjwadder (talk) 21:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

You mean this Ibn Sina Academy of Medieval Medicine and Sciences, the organization that Mohammad Hamid Ansari, former vice-chancellor of Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, formally inaugurated it on April 21, 2001? hmmm . -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:42, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

yes, boss. The organisation is a reputed one (Govt recognized) and also the founder whose book was cited there. Arifjwadder (talk) 21:46, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

The organization founded by the ex-chancellor of the the university which you state has no connections to the publisher..... -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:48, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

It was only inaugurated by the Vice-Chancellor of the university. He was non other than the present Vice President of India. And if you go through the history of the academy you will find it 50 years old which itself makes it a notable academy. However, the academy has no connections with the university. Arifjwadder (talk) 21:55, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Your recent editing history at Aligarh Muslim University shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thomas.W ^talk 20:44, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User_talk:TheRedPenOfDoom#Insane_Fellow. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 20:58, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

I am fed up with this biased editor (User_talk:TheRedPenOfDoom). He thinks himself as the master. He behaves as he knows everything and only his view is supreme. He always disrupts editing.Arifjwadder (talk) 21:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a university bulletin board, as you seem to believe. What TRPoD does is making sure that it stays an encyclopaedia. Thomas.W ^talk 21:17, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Now User_talk:TheRedPenOfDoom is saying that University of Oxford is poorly organised. Can you justify his comments User_talk:TheRedPenOfDoom#Aligarh_Muslim_University.Arifjwadder (talk) 21:22, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, List of Chancellors of the Aligarh Muslim University

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of Chancellors of the Aligarh Muslim University. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Aligarh_Muslim_University#Organisation. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Aligarh_Muslim_University#Organisation – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:56, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, List of Vice Chancellors of the Aligarh Muslim University

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of Vice Chancellors of the Aligarh Muslim University. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Aligarh_Muslim_University#Organisation. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Aligarh_Muslim_University#Organisation – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:56, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Weird my foot! The article is shabby with poor content. Don't tear apart that and scatter it everywhere. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:58, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Go and wash your dirty foot. Arifjwadder (talk) 10:59, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Lolz! The admin is gonna delete these two article for forking and then you removed the content from the main article as well. So its gonna be no where... Lolz!! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:06, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Vice Chancellors of the Aligarh Muslim University for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Vice Chancellors of the Aligarh Muslim University is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Vice Chancellors of the Aligarh Muslim University until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:38, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Vice Chancellors of the Aligarh Muslim University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Executive Council. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 25 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Siddons Union Club page, your edit caused a redundant parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Your recreation of Social Science Cyber Library

Hello. I have reverted your edit per WP:IINFO since Wikipedia isn't an indiscriminate collection of information. Having references isn't enough, the material must also by encyclopaedic, and the Cyber Library is definitely neither notable enough nor encyclopaedic enough to have a stand-alone article. It is, however, notable enough to merit a short mention in Aligarh Muslim University, and a redirect. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 17:36, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:58, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arifjwadder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been blocked without any notice and without citing proper reason. I have been accused of sock, but I owe no allegiance to any other accounts along with whom I have been blocked. It is a coincidence that they too have edited the same articles which I did. My contributions to the Wikipedia must be taken into consideration and the articles must be checked out again thoroughly. I edited page with solid citation which has never been questioned. No one could find any page where I edited which does not exists in the reality. There are two editors who have biased opinion against a particular university and when I started editing the organisation they always vandalized. That was the time when the other editors helped in improving the articles which does not mean that other accounts are mine. I don not need separate accounts to prove my point at all. Many of the article which had been tagged to be delete by the biased editor has been restored by experienced editors. Editing in the same page and supporting a genuine cause must not be held as sock as the other accounts are not mine. They helped in improving articles. Even one will find they improved article in the question and never vandalized anything. Arifjwadder (talk) 10:02, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

A notice was given right above this request, and there is a notice displayed to you when you edit. Given the findings at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arifjwadder, you will need to provide an explanation less equivalent to a shrug. I don't care about your content dispute. Kuru (talk) 11:43, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The current indef block notice was for very short duration. I even did not realize that any such notice was there. I did not vandalize any page and the page where I am accused of sock have been improved by me. It is a coincidence that other users too helped improve the article. The dispute is related only to Aligarh Muslim University. I have never done damage or disruption to Wikipedia. Arifjwadder (talk) 11:52, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Indefinite means "without duration". This block will not expire; you will need to post an unblock request which addresses the problem fully and convinces someone that it will not recur. I'm afraid that the technical evidence means you'll need to come up with something other than a simple denial. Kuru (talk) 12:09, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

I meant by my above comment was that the investigation for sock was done within 10 hours and closed without giving me a fair time to comment. How will I prove that those accounts were not mine??? Arifjwadder (talk) 13:42, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

You may wish to withdraw this request and read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks before making another. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 10:09, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:7th Filmsaaz

Hello, Arifjwadder. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "7th Filmsaaz".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:08, 13 March 2016 (UTC)