User talk:Arjayay/Archive 34

Archive 30

←

Archive 32

Archive 33

Archive 34

Amazon

Review the additional matter that I have added. I added the matter from www.amazon.com site. Is it not a reliable source..?? International Scientist (talk) 07:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

No Amazon is a sales site, its purpose is to sell things, not provide independent, verified, information (see WP:RSPAMAZON). The fact that something or someone exists, does not make it/them WP:Notable enough for inclusion in our articles.
Furthermore, your addition at English Wikipedia was solely vandalism, even if you had cited a WP:Reliable source - Arjayay (talk) 09:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Grootslang

Why did you remove my example. - Patagomaia 09:33, 25 Sepetember 2014 (UTC)

Hi Patagomaia - as my edit summary stated "Unsourced + unlinked" - the reader has no idea if it is true or not, and cannot look at a reference, or click on a link to another article to obtain further information. - Arjayay (talk) 08:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Redundant pleonasms

Thank you for your edit summary, introducing me to the the word pleonasm. _signed, Willondon (talk) 21:09, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

No trouble Willondon - are there any other words that that you would like an introduction to ? ;-) - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 21:12, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

About mehsi

I updated the details in complete sections but you revert all the changes... please revert to my version as it was most updated 46.185.168.59 (talk) 22:51, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Your additions were totally unsourced and malformatted, so cannot be re-added. - Arjayay (talk) 22:54, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

How it is malformed??

Can u give examples? 46.185.168.35 (talk) 22:57, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

You can do one thing keep all the data which i updated and make the formatting correct 46.185.168.35 (talk) 22:59, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

I belong to that place and what i write it's all in a book and present in that location 46.185.168.35 (talk) 23:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

I could correct all your misused text size, bold etc. but there is no point until your additions are properly referenced. - Arjayay (talk) 23:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

How you can say that my additions are not properly referred, i only corrected the way and explained that ,if u need to verify the distances u can use google maps ,if u need to verify the area u can use the eastchamparan official website or bihar government websites. Or if u even can't verify anything let me know which point u want to know i will provide you the exact reference for that

But you will revert my all changes 46.185.168.35 (talk) 23:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

No, IP from Jordan, as I have already explained, your additions were totally unsourced, so cannot be re-added to the article. Your edits deleted 4 references and added none whatsoever.
Wikipedia is not interested in who you are, where you are from, what you "know", or even what you have found out.
Wikipedia is only interested in what has already been published in reliable, independent sources published by a body with a reputation for fact-checking - No blogs, no self-published sources, no bodies with a conflict of interest, no promotional sites.
These sources must be properly cited in order to support any information added to, or changed in our pages, so the information can be verified as true in the future.
It is NOT up to me, any other editor, or the reader, to find sources, or add references for you. The responsibility for providing citations is solely on whoever adds or changes any information.
You failed to do this, which is why your edits have been, and will continue to be, reverted, until you do add proper references.
Please see Help:Referencing for beginners for the "how to" guide. - Arjayay (talk) 10:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)