Arlec2112

Welcome!

Hello, TheGamerBTGB, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Adrian Biankin, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Darylgolden^(talk) Ping when replying 05:15, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Adrian Biankin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Adrian Biankin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Darylgolden^(talk) Ping when replying 05:15, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Johnston (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gary Johnston and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gary Johnston, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, TheGamerBTGB! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

DMR logo

I have noticed that the Department of Main Roads (New South Wales) logo that you uploaded in December 2020 was deleted on Commons last month. I am just wondering if you remember where you sourced it from, as I also intend to upload the DMR logo on English Wikipedia (not Commons). I just want to see if the logo you found back then will be the best logo to be reinstated on the DMR page, otherwise I will use DMR logos I can find on reports from the 1980s on Open Gov NSW. Please ping me when you respond. Marcnut1996 (talk) 04:07, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tollway sign F3.png

A tag has been placed on File:Tollway sign F3.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please add the appropriate fair use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 202.172.126.228 (talk) 15:30, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Unacceptable use of non-free content. Wikipedia's [content project page] specifically cites "A photo from a press agency or photo agency (e.g., AP or Getty Images), unless the photo itself is the subject of sourced commentary in the article." as being an unacceptable use of non-free content. In order for the photograph to fulfil the 'subject of sourced commentary' exception, text would need to be written referring specifically to the photograph itself (not the content of the photograph), which would certainly be non-encyclopaedic due to sheer lack of notability. Even if the aforementioned issue was not a factor, the uploader's current justifications for fair use are extremely vague and inappropriate. The 'purpose' justification is invalid due to the 'subject of sourced commentary' issue mentioned above (again, the photograph itself must be the subject of commentary, not the content of the photograph). The 'minimality' justification cited does not address the 'minimal use' of the image at all. The 'commercial' justification is totally invalid as the photograph is still at full resolution (cropped, but still full resolution) and NSW Roads and Maritime charges in excess of hundreds of dollars for editorial use of the image at commercial rates, therefore certainly impacting the commercial viability of the photograph. Given that several of the ten required criteria for non-free use quoted on the [content criteria page] are invalid due to the reasons mentioned above, I am requesting a speedy deletion of this image due to copyright infringement.

It should be mentioned that any further attempts to upload and link this particular image will be reported to the Administrators' noticeboard as per the repeat copyright infringement guidelines., as I have already had to do this once before with the same Getty Images photograph, only that time it was blatantly watermarked with zero fair use justification. 202.172.126.228 (talk) 15:31, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vertigo (Band)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vertigo (Band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 11:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Max Judd (Student)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Max Judd (Student) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tollens (talk) 01:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC)