Armadiion

Skin care article critique

Are there viewpoints that are over-represented, or under-represented?

I noticed a few of the outlined pieces of the article were not filled out and say "add from" with citations after it but no content listed. reference: 'Stoma Add from [20][21]'

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

I thought a lot of the information on skin care services was up to date but the services had no information on them. I think describing the skin care services is important to educate people on things they could add to their skin care. Reference: "Practices that enhance appearance include the use of cosmetics, botulinum, exfoliation, fillers, laser resurfacing, microdermabrasion, peels, retinol therapy.'

Armadiion (talk) 05:25, 5 April 2018 (UTC) Leeanne O'Neal