User talk:Armando/Archive 1

Archive 1

IEEE P1901

The text has been restored (although you will need clarifiy if wikipedia's reusers can use the text). If that is the case please leave a note on the article's talk page and if posible wikify the article.Geni 15:47, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing the hovercraft definition

Image copyright problem with Image:Record_ETR.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Record_ETR.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 03:12, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

sorry

Sorry i wrongly edit your userpage:(--Ugur Basak 13:33, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

DVB-H+

Please, look at my comment to your entry on DVB-H+ under Talk:DVB-H article. Thanks. 19:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

mistake to TGV?

I think you accidentally deleted half a paragraph at the end of TGV. You'll probably want to put it back :) Stevage 14:32, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Disambiguation pages

Hi there, I've just tidied up your entry on the DB dabpage - generally additions to disambig pages should follow the manual of style: MoS:DP. Thanks/wangi 11:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject_Telecommunications

Hi. You have made many good contributions in the area of telecommunications. Why not join the WikiProject Telecommunications? Mange01 00:28, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Options

It's not a matter of whether it's a real company. It needs to have independent verifiable sources that it meets the notability guidelines. I note that it has been recreated and deleted again, so clearly there is some work to do. Jimfbleak.talk.15:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC) (UTC)

1000 Gbit/s

Thanks for the correction. I wonder how long we have to wait before I can write "1000 Gbit/sec" and NOT have it be a typo :-) -- RoySmith (talk) 14:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

August 2007

A tag has been placed on Called Subscriber Identification, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Already a similar article at Call Subscriber ID

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --== Waycool²⁷ ==-- 18:17, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Called Subscriber Identification

I agree. However, after doing some research and thinking, I think this title you created makes more sense. I've left a comment in the Discuss page of the article.-- --== Waycool²⁷ ==-- 01:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of PIMBY

An article that you have been involved in editing, PIMBY, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PIMBY. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting talk 07:55, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Copyright violation in Radio Frequency Systems

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Radio Frequency Systems, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Radio Frequency Systems is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Radio Frequency Systems, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 10:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Availability of DVD+RW DL

See [1], for example. Cheers. Brianski 02:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

On second look, I think you're right. Serves me right not to read marketing with a fine tooth comb. Brianski 21:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Nokia 6086

An editor has nominated Nokia 6086, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nokia 6086 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

February 2008

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page List of deployed WiMAX networks worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Steve Crossin (talk) 13:28, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

ISO/IEC 80000

Hi, I see you've edited this article. Might you have access to 80000-3? We're trying to clarify whether the usage of annum versus year has changed from the ISO 31 usage. Also of interest is whether use of the symbol "a" to represent them is still just a suggestion (as before) or if it has been firmed up. Discussion at talk:year and at talk:annum. Hope you can help.LeadSongDog (talk) 04:01, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nokia N85

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nokia N85, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironholds 10:26, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Record_ETR.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Record_ETR.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 20:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Wireless HDMI

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Wireless HDMI, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from the trademark HDMI. Both the text HDMI and High-Definition Multimedia Interface are copyrights of the HDMI Licensing, LLC. The term "Wireless HDMI" is a misuse and an infringement of the HDMI trademark. There is no such thing as a "Wireless HDMI" technology since HDMI Licensing, LLC. never officially released a wireless version of its technology and all current wireless solutions use proprietary 3rd party technologies (i.e. WirelessHD or WHDI) unrelated to the HDMI technology for their wireless links.. As a copyright violation, Wireless HDMI appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Wireless HDMI has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Wireless HDMI and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Wireless HDMI with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Wireless HDMI.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hdmi org (talk) 21:24, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Wireless HDMI

I have nominated Wireless HDMI, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wireless HDMI. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 21:38, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of XpanD

The article XpanD has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Angel Cupid (talk) 11:02, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of YIMBY

An article that you have been involved in editing, YIMBY, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YIMBY. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nsaa (talk) 13:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of XpanD

I have nominated XpanD, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XpanD (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Angel Cupid (talk) 09:37, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Armando82! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 698 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Pietro Lunardi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Girolamo Sirchia - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:12, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Usurpation

I'd like to usurp Armando. Armando82 (talk) 20:44, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Computer Simulation Technology for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Computer Simulation Technology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computer Simulation Technology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Joseph Roe^Tk•Cb, 10:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of GELLMU

The article GELLMU has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

4 year-old software stub with no references. no significant content found on google.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:11, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Global rename

I hereby confirm that I am currently globally usurping Armando accounts that doesn't yet belong to my SUL Armando (active mainly on enwiki and itwiki, Me, on Wikimedia projects). --Armando (talk) 14:27, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Done on de-WP. "Armando" should now be free for auto-connection. Regards, FritzG (talk) 21:53, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

usurpation @ trwiki

• Hello, you can now usurp the username @ trwiki by simply opening with your SUL account. --Mskyrider (talk) 18:13, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

es.wikisource: usurp done. --LadyInGrey (talk) 21:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Rename on es.wikibooks

Hello Armando. Sorry for the delay, but the usurpation you requested is done. More info here. Best regards, --m:marcoaurelio 20:35, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

de.wiktionary

Hello Armando. Sorry for the delay, but the usurpation you requested is done. At least I hope it is. ;-) Could you try to use the account and report back to me if you encounter any problems? Regards --Baisemain (talk) 23:02, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

hr:wiki

Username Armando on hr:wiki is now free. --Roberta F. (talk) 23:13, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Samsung Galaxy S III Mini, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NFC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:17, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Armando. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Armando. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dr. DivX

The article Dr. DivX has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, no coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. wumbolo ^^^ 17:50, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Armando. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Armando. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Armando! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:02, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of URL Snooper for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article URL Snooper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/URL Snooper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 14:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC)