ArmyOfPie
September 2007
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:ViewtifulZak, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 01:51, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- That was my old username, and I had some information on there about myself that I no longer want on there. ArmyOfPie 03:54, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Then it would be better to do that under that username so it can't be misunderstood as vandalism. — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 04:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Which I see you've done. Apologies for any misunderstanding! — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 04:03, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, while I think of it, that information is still accessible through the history. If you want it gone, you might want to put a {{db-author}} tag on there, and an admin can delete it completely. — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 04:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you very much for the help. ArmyOfPie 04:13, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome. — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 04:14, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you very much for the help. ArmyOfPie 04:13, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, while I think of it, that information is still accessible through the history. If you want it gone, you might want to put a {{db-author}} tag on there, and an admin can delete it completely. — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 04:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Which I see you've done. Apologies for any misunderstanding! — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 04:03, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Then it would be better to do that under that username so it can't be misunderstood as vandalism. — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 04:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Soundtracks
editWhat encyclopedic value is there to a soundtrack list besides "people might wanna know"? - A Link to the Past (talk) 03:03, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- It's a part of the game, maybe not the most important part of the game but it's still in there. The soundtrack to the Tony Hawk video-games has always been of much discussion, I remember many magazines freaking out when certain bands were announced for the soundtrack. Some bands even get some good publicity for being on the soundtrack.ArmyOfPie 07:20, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- "It exists" is not an argument to keep content. - A Link to the Past (talk) 20:59, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't say that. Did you even read what I said in full? ArmyOfPie 09:52, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- "It exists" is not an argument to keep content. - A Link to the Past (talk) 20:59, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:SuperEmpireStrikesBack.jpg
editThanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SuperEmpireStrikesBack.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 12:11, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Jallard.jpg
editThanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jallard.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:27, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Jaymamays.jpg
editThank you for uploading Image:Jaymamays.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 19:52, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Srthefaceoflove.jpg
editThanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Srthefaceoflove.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 13:35, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Image:Brutallegendscreen.jpg
editI have tagged Image:Brutallegendscreen.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 21:35, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Gameinformer nov07.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Gameinformer nov07.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 01:24, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Tony Hawk Games Wiki
editHelp is needed at the Tony Hawk Games Wiki, which can be found here. It is very lonely. There are only about 3 users on there. If you join, and you have questions, please see this user page. The Tony Hawk Game Wiki is based on the Tony Hawk series of video games. There is alot of stuff on the wiki, but we feel so much more can be done on there. --98.148.171.15 (talk) 00:00, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)