Armynut15

Similar units.

Armynut15, just becuase they were based on the orginal SAS doesnt mean they are similar in the early days 50-80s yes, but now not at all similar, just look at SASR and Delta they operate completely different then the SAS even though they were based on the SAS and just becuase they are a countries premier unit also doesnt mean they are similar, also NZSAS are not similar to SASR, NZSAS are more similar to Australias 2nd premier unit the 2nd Commando Regiment, Im not sure you have any reliable knowledge on military or special operations, so please do not edit unless sourced, im removing the inappropriate units from the SASR page.SOTGMichael (talk) 01:37, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

I'm an army brat. And you're right. They're not similar. At least from an operational standpoint. But adding Premier Special Missions Units of other countries didn't sound good. But I won't force the issue. Armynut15 (talk) 01:48, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

White Brazilian

Nice work on getting rid of outstanding uncited refs in the article!

In looking at your contributions history, I have noted that you tend to forget to add an edit summary: useful for other contributors and editors to get an idea of what the changes are and the rationale. If you're having problems remembering to do so (it's a common problem when you're still a newbie), you can go to preferences > editing and check the 'Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary' field until it becomes second nature.

Good to have you on board. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:49, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

I'll do my best. thank you for the heads up. Armynut15 (talk) 23:43, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Cheers! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Armynut15. You have new messages at Iryna Harpy's talk page.
Message added 02:42, 15 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Iryna Harpy (talk) 02:42, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

A great place for advice and assistance

Hello! Armynut15, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Armynut15, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:03, 15 January 2014 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

17th Division (Syria) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mechanized

18th Armoured Division (Syria) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Armoured

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

18th Armoured Division

Thank you for starting this article. Where did you find out that they were a 'reserve' formation? Cheers and thanks Buckshot06 (talk) 19:37, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

just an assumption, due to the divisions size and lack of useArmynut15 (talk) 02:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Can't do that here, due WP:V. Have to find a source !! Cheers and thanks Buckshot06 (talk) 19:39, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Werieth (talk) 15:31, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Beloki, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. CT Cooper · talk 20:34, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I have responded to your comment at User talk:CT Cooper. CT Cooper · talk 21:33, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

15th Special Forces Division (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Western, Division, Airborne and Jordanian

14th Special Forces Division (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Western and Airborne

602 Commando Company (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Airborne and Córdoba Province

601 Air Assault Regiment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Airborne

601 Commando Company (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Airborne

Special Operations Forces Group (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Airborne

Syrian Kurdish–Islamist conflict (2013-present) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Abu Musab

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Danish Frogman Corps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Presidential Unit Citation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Blocked

I've blocked this account indefinitely for sockpuppetry per the findings of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Beloki. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:54, 11 February 2014 (UTC)