Arnab Piush Biswas

Your submission at Articles for creation: A.D. Dolphin (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A.D. Dolphin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:A.D. Dolphin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:13, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Arnab Piush Biswas! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:13, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A.D. Dolphin (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A.D. Dolphin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:A.D. Dolphin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:58, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Hello Arnab Piush Biswas. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:A.D. Dolphin, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Arnab Piush Biswas. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Arnab Piush Biswas|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:00, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

REPLY

THANK YOU FOR REACHING OUT. I am a student and always wanted to contribute to Wikipedia. This is just a passion for work. No payment was promised. I have a friend. His name is Ankan. He is also a contributor to Bangla Wikipedia. when we were chatting on a messenger, He just curiously asked me if I could write articles on Wikipedia. He just Randomly chooses the word Dolphin. And found the Name on Google and asked me to write a biography on it. I just took that as a friendly work to learn to contribute. I promise that I and Ankan are not and will not be paid to submit the work. I strongly assure you that this is not paid work. I don't have any connection with Mr. Dolphin. Ankan, is just a friend of mine, since 2016. And he is also a student. PLEASE LET ME KNOW, how I can additionally prove this to be a non-paid work. And please guide me for the next step. Thank you for your time. Arnab Piush Biswas

THANK YOU FOR REACHING OUT. I am a student and always wanted to contribute to Wikipedia. This is just a passion for work. No payment was promised. I have a friend. His name is Ankan. He is also a contributor to Bangla Wikipedia. when we were chatting on a messenger, He just curiously asked me if I could write articles on Wikipedia. He just Randomly chooses the word Dolphin. And found the Name on Google and asked me to write a biography on it. I just took that as a friendly work to learn to contribute. I promise that I and Ankan are not and will not be paid to submit the work. I strongly assure you that this is not paid work. I don't have any connection with Mr. Dolphin. Ankan, is just a friend of mine, since 2016. And he is also a student. PLEASE LET ME KNOW, how I can additionally prove this to be a non-paid work. And please guide me for the next step. Thank you for your time. Arnab Piush Biswas Arnab Piush Biswas (talk) 12:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have an undisclosed financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future. – Joe (talk) 10:47, 3 September 2020 (UTC)