Arnemann
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
- If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Francs2000 | Talk 11:33, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
testArnemann 11:47, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Nice work
editHi Arnemann! Nice work with the table on Norwegian Premier League 2005. Much nicer than the table I put in. :-) Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:09, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
- Hi there. I see your name in many articles I try to contribute to! Very nice work indeed! NuclearFunk 17:38, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Image:Johncarew.jpg has been listed as a possible copyright violation
editAn image that you uploaded, Image:Johncarew.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. |
Altså, det går ikke ann å ta et bilde fra tyrkisk wikipedia uten lisensinformasjon, og bruke det her. Jeg tenker bildet av Lille-John er stjålet fra NFF. Hilsen kjetil_r 12:59, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Article improvement drive
editHi Arnemann,
The Football AID is restarting. The next project article is to be selected on January 1, 2006. Please look at the nominations and take part actively. Thanks. -Aabha (talk) 10:44, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
Football AID
editFootball World Cup has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Image copyright problem with Image:Ullevaal2.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Ullevaal2.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. kjetil_r 23:35, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- Dette gjelder forresten flere av bildene du har lastet opp. Vennligst gå over dem og legg til lisensinformasjon. En liste over bildene du har lastet opp på en.wikipedia.org finner du her. Hilsen Kjetil 23:39, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Football AID 23 - 30 January
editBobby Charlton has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Football AID 29 January - 4 February
editList of football (soccer) clubs has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Image copyright problem with Image:Ehagen2.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Ehagen2.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. -- Longhair 11:33, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Sidebrok.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Sidebrok.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 09:46, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Riise.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Riise.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Longhair 15:13, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Football AID 5 February - 11 February
editBayern Munich has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Uploading of images
editHello Arnemann. Please stop uploading images which are copyrighted/unlicecend and not usable in Wikipedia. Jeg minner også om at du bryter den norske åndsverkloven, noe som kan medføre erstatningsansvar overfor fotografene det gjelder (denne loven gjelder selvsagt bare om du befinner deg i Norge [det er irelevant at det er til engelsk Wikipedia dette skjer] ). kjetil_r 23:08, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Offside diagram
editHi Arnemann,
I have removed your diagram from Offside law (football) as it does not include a ball and therefore can not convey whether or not the player is in an offside position.
Cheers, Dave.
Request to Merge - Franchise FC
editDid you have a convincing reason for this RtM that you'd like to share with the rest of us, or were you just making a dig? Apart from slapping the RtM on it, you've done nothing. You didn't even intro the discussion, let alone contribute to it. --Concrete Cowboy 00:19, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Shiltonb1.jpg
editThis media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Shiltonb1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 06:58, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Football AID 19 February - 25 February
editFootball (soccer) has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Royal League 2005-06
editHi Arnemann. I have seen that you had deleted the fixture list, at the quarter finals in the Royal League 2005-06 article. The reason I made them, was that you then could see the playing time and the venue. You can't if there's only the table, but the table is good to see the agg. score and witch team was eliminated. I just think that it's better with the list, than with the columns 1st leg & 2nd leg. Kalaha 10:49, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
- I understand your point, but since there are no lists in any other articles of European club tournments like UEFA Cup 2005-06 and UEFA Champions League 2005-06 in the knock-out stages, I think the Royal League 2005-06 article should be made in the same way. If the article should have a list like you made, the same changes should be made in the UEFA Cup 2005-06 and UEFA Champions League 2005-06 (and earlier seasons) articles. Arnemann 17:38, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
no source: Image:Stadium Oslo S.jpg
editImage Tagging Image:Stadium Oslo S.jpg
editThis media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Stadium Oslo S.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.
Hvor kommer dette bildet fra? Er du helt sikker på at det kommer fra et «press kit» eller er «advertising material»? kjetil_r 08:52, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Tbanekart.pdf
editThanks for uploading Image:Tbanekart.pdf. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. BRossow 19:23, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi, could you please provide a reference for 2006 Winter Olympics points? Thanks. :) -- Schnee (cheeks clone) 01:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Football AID 26 February - 4 March
editBobby Robson has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Is Image:Stadium Oslo S.jpg a promotional photo?
editHello Arnemann. You have tagged this image as {{promotional}}, but I can not see that the criterias in Wikipedia:Publicity photos are followed. The guidelines says
Most photos that are found on the Internet are not publicity photos. Publicity photos found on the Internet typically have the following characteristics:
- They are found in a section of a web site called "media kit", "press kit", "press", or something similar
- The images are available in high-resolution TIFF versions (upload the JPEG versions to Wikipedia though)
- There is text on the site asking that the photographer be credited and/or there is licence text permitting reproduction for certain purposes (usually using them to sell products is prohibited).
Do you think the use of this image follows these rules? I have tagged the image as {{fair use disputed}} kjetil_r 00:44, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Football AID 5 March - 11 March
editA.C. Milan has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Football AID 12 March - 18 March
editRonaldinho has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
re:Eddie Guerrero
editHi Arnemann - I wanted to tell you that I strongly commend your initiative on making Eddie Guerrero a featured article. However, I must point out that unless you have the book "Cheating Death, Stealing Life" as a reference, there will be a significant set of gaps and problems to resolve - the article won't be comprehensive.
I strongly desire to help you achieve FA status for this article, and I hope to obtain the book in a while. In the interim, I wish you the best of luck. Viva La Raza! Rama's Arrow 20:14, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Football AID 19 March - 25 March
editEuropean Football Championship has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Football AID 26 March - 1 April
editFootball in Germany has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
2006 Winter Olympics GA Nomination
editArnemann, your recent nomination for 2006 Winter Olympics to be promoted to good article status, and I got some interesting results. I looked through other articles on the same topci to find the style for this kind of articles. I am only failing this on style issues, if you can/wish to argue your reasons on style, then please do so. If I can appreciate your reasons then I'll happily award this article GA status. This was a very difficult choice, but I'm tempoarily failing this because I'm not knowledgable of Olympic style guide, the articles I did read seem stronger.
Reccommendations:
- Expand intro, the others seemed stronger
- Move sections that are in paragraphs (an exmaple of these is "Host selection process") to the top of the article, below the lists
- Move the portal link to the very top of the article (compare with the link in Pokémon and Africa)
- Put the external links at the very bottom, swapping it with references is somewhat confusing
- I WOULD prose the "Highlights" rather than insane amounts of listing
- Expand information on the opening ceremony with pictures, it was AMAZING, tell us about it!
(If you are not best suited to talk on this subject, you may freely refer someone from the Olympic project on your behalf.)
It's still a very good article, please reply to me, I WANT to pass this but I need response! Many thanks, Highway 21:58, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Football AID 2 April - 8 April
editTimeline of football (soccer) has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Football AID 9 April - 15 April
editFC St. Pauli has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Does not have sufficient source and copyright information and will be deleted unless you provide it. Thanks, ed g2s • talk 21:19, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
- Please proide a link or statement where http://www.vpn.no says their images are free to use for all and everything! Without such a statement these images have to be deleted. --Denniss 13:23, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Football AID 16 April - 22 April
editUkrainian Premier League has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Football AID 23 April - 29 April
editHistory of football (soccer) has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
FA Cup Final
editThanks for editing the article. I'd forgotten about the column headers for 'winners' and 'runners-up', and I placed Liverpool and West Ham in alphabetical order as is typical for the final. I've now reverted it to the way it was before I tampered with it. Cheers ears!
Slumgum | yap | stalk | 22:18, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Hello Arnemann. Image:Klanen1.jpg lacks the necessary information. Special:Upload says that you as the uploader must include “explanation of why you believe the file is so licenced”. Where at klanen.no does it say that the image is licensed under such terms as {{NoRightsReserved}}? kjetil_r 20:25, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not able to read norwegian but it looks like all/many vpn.no images are bought from Digitalsport AS, see here. This makes the copyvios. --Denniss 21:31, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- You are right, Denniss. Dersom annet ikke er opplyst, er alle bilder vi bruker © Digitalsport AS (approximate translation: "unless otherwise stated, all images we use are © Digitalsport AS"). I will list them for deletion asap. kjetil_r 22:52, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
I've changes the tag to {{CopyrightedFreeUseProvidedThat|www.klanen.no is credited as the source}} the last one was wrong, sorry Arnemann 11:22, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- But the copyright notice at klanen.no clearly states Copyright © Klanen 1991-2003. Why can this image be used freely? kjetil_r 13:37, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- The pic is from 2004 or 2005. And really, I don't really think that Klanen cares that a picture from a match from their website is used on wikipedia. i can guarantee that they won't sue wikipedia for a picture used in the Vålerenga article. If it is that imporntant to you, you can send them a mail and ask Arnemann 14:58, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- It is important to have a proper license for all images here. Please ask who is the copyright holder and if they hold it please ask for the imags to be used under a free license. If they deny a use then these images have to be deleted. For more information visit Wikipedia:Image use policy --Denniss 16:26, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- I did send them an e-mail regarding this image one month ago, but they did not answer.
- Nor I think that Klanen cares about the use of this image in Wikipedia, but maybe Klanen care about the use of this image in other websites. It is important that all material in Wikipedia may be used by others, also comercially. You simply can not assume that this image may be used freely.
- Arnemann, please stop uploading copyvios to Wikipedia. This is damaging the project. kjetil_r 19:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Football AID 30 April - 6 May
editHistory of the FIFA World Cup has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Football AID 28 May - 3 June
editFootball in Norway has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Football AID June 4-10
editUEFA Cup has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Football AID 18 June - 24 June
editNetherlands national football team has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Football AID 30 July - 6 August
editJuventus F.C. has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Football AID 8 August - 15 August
editFIFA World Rankings has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Football AID 13 August - 20 August
editDunga has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Hi, seeing you are interested in football this is an invitation to contribute to this discussion to clarify certain issues about football player notability. I think clearer guidelines are needed to avoid repeated inappropriate nominations for deletion and time consuming discussions. Cheers! StephP 19:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Adeccoligaen.gif
editThis file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Adeccoligaen.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Mslogo1.gif
editThis file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Mslogo1.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Mslogo1.gif)
editThanks for uploading Image:Mslogo1.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 11:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Tippeliga-logo.gif
editThanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tippeliga-logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:50, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Aalesund.gif
editThanks for uploading Image:Aalesund.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PLAYERS singel.jpg
editThank you for uploading Image:PLAYERS singel.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:Shiltonb1.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Shiltonb1.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mosmof (talk) 23:27, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Skeid2.png
editThanks for uploading Image:Skeid2.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:55, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Valerenga logo.png
editThanks for uploading Image:Valerenga logo.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Holmenkollbanen
editHi! :-) If you have moro photos of the stations on Holmenkollbanen (or the oslo subway in general), like File:Gaustadtbane.jpg, we (the oslo subway nerds) would really appriciate if you upload it :-D Yosh3000 (talk) 19:23, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:Vålerenga I.F. players
editI have nominated Category:Vålerenga I.F. players (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Vålerenga Fotball players (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 17:52, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:PLAYERS singel.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:PLAYERS singel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 19:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
editHello Arnemann! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Christian Grindheim - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Tom Henning Hovi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:25, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
The article Sasha Gabor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of notability per WP:PORNBIO
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tabercil (talk) 02:39, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
File:Bilde113.jpg listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bilde113.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 17:09, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Invite to the African Destubathon
editHi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
The file File:Global spread of H5N1 map.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned map.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 19:11, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Skeid2.png
editThanks for uploading File:Skeid2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Wimbledon fc.png
editThanks for uploading File:Wimbledon fc.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)