Image tagging for Image:Curcumin.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Curcumin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 17:06, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Curcumin.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shell babelfish 02:16, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

File:Demethoxycurcumin.JPG listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Demethoxycurcumin.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 00:26, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Bismethoxycurcumin.JPG listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bismethoxycurcumin.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 00:27, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

June 2011

edit

  This is your last and only warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Curcuminoid. - Happysailor (Talk) 09:36, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- DQ (t) (e) 11:39, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Describing your edit as "vandalism" is no doubt a mistake, though an understandable one. However, speedy deletion because the author has blanked the page applies only when nobody else has made significant edits to the page, which was not so in this case. Although you created the article originally, you do not own it, and you do not have the right to remove the work of all the other editors who have contributed to it. However, since this was probably a case of not being sufficiently aware of the relevant guideline, rather than intentional vandalism, I will consult the blocking administrator about whether to lift the block. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:44, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
I have looked things over again, and have   unblocked you per the above. A read of the G7 Criterion might not hurt things. -- DQ (t) (e) 12:02, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
As a point of clarification (not sure it is related to the attempt to blank/delete the page), the images are up for deletion because their style and format is poor and better ones are available (unused low quality file, higher quality ones used in article), not because there is a problem with the chemicals or the article about them. DMacks (talk) 18:03, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed Image Deletion

edit

  A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply