Artemis-Arethusa

Orphaned fair use image (Image:The-King-in-Yellow-(Wrap).gif)

Yeah, I tried to upload a scan of a century-old book, but I messed up the code to get it to appear on the page and it's gone now. Live and learn. Artemis-Arethusa 00:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

If you still have the scan, upolaod it again and i'll help get it onto the proepr page if you like. DES ^(talk) 14:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Art Green, The Hairy Who and Chicago Imagists

Hi Artemis-Arethusa, my research reveals that The Hairy Who was a Chicago group in the 1960s that put on a few shows. After Art Green left Chicago and the group, the Chicago Imagists was formed by remaining members of The Hairy Who and some new members. I will update the Chicago Imagists article to reflect this. Clerks. 21:03, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for starting the Imagists article. I probably wouldn't have realized that I knew enough about them to make an article. Clerks. 15:54, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Vanity gallery undelted

Because i noticed your commetns at the Villlage Pump, Vanity gallery has been undelted. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. DES ^(talk) 14:39, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

You are quite welcome. Someone deleted it, I presuem, but the deletion log entry is missing, so i have no idea who or for what reason. Since I don't see any obvious reason for the deletion, I treated it as if I ahd come upon it with a speedy tag. Log glitches do happen sometimes. DES ^(talk) 21:11, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Merge made

To let you know I have carried out the merge at Eglinton Tournament of 1839. Charles Matthews 13:25, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

no user page

I just saw your post at WP:VPA. To stop people from posting to your User page by accident, you can do two things:

1. Modify your signature under "my preferences" (upper right of the page). Add [[User talk:Artemis-Arethusa|Artemis-Arethusa]] to the signature box and click the "Raw Signature" box. That way anyone that clicks on your username on any page that you have signed is automatically directed to your talk page.
2. Create your user page as a redirect to your talk page. The only drawback of this is that then your user page does technically exist.

At a minimum, you may wish to do #1 to make it harder for people to accidentally get to your user page. -- Flyguy649 ^talk _contribs 19:41, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Bristol Renaissance Faire

Nicely done on that page. Looks really, really good. — HelloAnnyong [ t · c ] 05:06, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Dc5.jpg

Hello again. Just wanted to let you know that I added Dc5.jpg to the list of images to be deleted (as a follow-up to the discussion on the village pump). — HelloAnnyong [ t · c ] 05:27, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jill King

I have nominated Jill King, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill King. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

• Okay, that's good to know. Glad to see someone is taking AfD in stride. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:22, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

• Yeah. Just check my talk page archives, there're tons of people who have chewed me out for listing their pages for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

WT:CHICAGO

Did you see your response at WT:CHICAGO?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 15:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Eglinton Tournament of 1839

I think with a little more work, this article can attain Good Article status. I've done a bit of work on cleaning up the references and improving the organization of the article, but I don't actually know anything about the event, nor do I have ready access to most of the cited works. I know you've contributed to it in the past, can you help check items off the to-do list? Thanks, Cmadler (talk) 19:27, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Don't put copyright infringement into Wikipedia

As you did in this edit to Holling_C._Holling. The paragraph beginning: "Holling graduated from the" is a direct copy from the author bio already listed at the bottom of the article. That bio has a clear statement of copyright at the bottom. That was clearly illegal. Did you think no-one would notice? Don't do that. Now we'll have to go through all your over 500 contribs to see what other legal surprises may be lurking. Sigh. I hate it when folks do this. JesseW, the juggling janitor 20:59, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Artemis-Arethusa. You have new messages at Moonriddengirl's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

And now you have more, at the same location. Sorry it's taken me so long to respond to your kind and sensible apology. I've just now read over (and did a bit of copyediting) on Visual arts of Chicago; it is very nicely cited -- I presume one of it's purposes is to provide a launching point for writing bios of various of the currently redlinked artists mentioned? Keep up the good work. JesseW, the juggling janitor 07:54, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Artemis-Arethusa! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 81 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Adam Green (cartoonist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:49, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Goddess

If you write something, anything, on your user page then your user name will not appear in red, but rather in blue and that seems, amoung things, to be much better for a water nymph. Carptrash (talk) 21:08, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

It seems to me that aesthetics usually don't win out, especially when up against the marketplace, but actually this is a bit more than that. I have 1,500 (more or less) articles on my watchlist and I feel honor bound (another trait that has trouble with the marketplace) to check all edits done by annon users or those by red links. However I am also aware that my problems to not translate into your problems. Which, trust me, is a very good thing. Carptrash (talk) 21:19, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

P.S. You mean these? [1]

That's considered (by me) to be a pretty cheesy reason. But, as you pointed out, wikipedia is not about me. This [2] site, which you probably know, has a lot of detail that could be tastefully strip mined. Carptrash (talk) 21:35, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

I am reluctant to suggest making your life tougher to make mine easier, but yes, you have grasped the essentials. However I, for one, will recognize you when we cross from now on, goddesses being what they are and mortals being what they are. Carptrash (talk) 22:14, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Category:History of fashion

I notice you were populating History of fashion with military uniform articles. Why is this? Don't they already fall into subcategories such as Category:United States Army Uniforms etc. etc.? and By the Way, I thought you were a new editor because you don't have a user page. Red user pages usually means brand new user. Sadads (talk) 17:33, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Why not just move the category into the category, instead of each individual page? Sadads (talk) 17:41, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

If you are doing categories you might want to try WP:HotCat which you can find at Special:Preferences under the Gadgets tab. Sadads (talk) 19:12, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Clarion Writers' Workshop

Category:Clarion Writers' Workshop, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 10:12, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Some Clarion attendees and instructors

Can be found here. Shsilver (talk) 03:32, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Discworld task force

Your edits to Discworld-related articles have been noticed, and are appreciated. A few of us are trying to establish a Discworld taskforce to monitor and improve Wikipedia's Discworld coverage. If you are interested, please go here and leave a comment that you wish to participate.--Mobtown Mongrel (talk) 13:12, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Tanith Lee redirect pages

I have closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faces Under Water and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Birthgrave in accordance with WP:SK and WP:NAC. Please read the reasoning as to why I did this, which is at the top of both pages and is identical for both. You are welcome to list these at WP:RFD; however, you may want to look over WP:RFD#DELETE before doing so. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:53, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:2001_Millennium_Philcon_World_Science_Fiction_Convention_program.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:2001_Millennium_Philcon_World_Science_Fiction_Convention_program.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 22:39, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Norton Garfinkle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colgate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Warning

You are edit warring on Books LLC (reverting without comment). You will be blocked from editing if you persist. Rklawton (talk) 18:45, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Interesting. I most certainly am not. I'm not sure I've used the "revert" function even once in the eight years I have been a Wikipedia editor, nor did I undo anyone's edits. What I did do was add a line about the controversial nature of the publisher mentioned to its page, as well as a note that its primary methodology is copying and binding Wikipedia articles, which is simple fact and was already cited in the references given.Artemis-Arethusa (talk) 21:50, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

You're invited to join WikiProject Women artists!

Hello Artemis-Arethusa! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Women artists. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women artists, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles about women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject Women artists page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Members". I look forward to your involvement!

SarahStierch (talk) 08:22, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Artemis-Arethusa. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Category:Women Surrealists has been nominated for discussion

Category:Women Surrealists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 00:58, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nina Weiss

The article Nina Weiss has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Nina Weiss – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability. Please see the plain-language summary of our notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Speciate (talk) 18:58, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Artemis-Arethusa. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Artemis-Arethusa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Artemis-Arethusa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1600s fantasy novels

A tag has been placed on Category:1600s fantasy novels indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:38, 2 May 2021 (UTC)