Articleye
Welcome
edit
|
Thanks for your reviews. I have addressed your comment at Tulsidas. --Redtigerxyz Talk 04:54, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your review and comments. I have tried to address your concerns. Since I have rewritten this article and am the major contributor, I thought that I will be in a position to satisfy your concerns.--Indian Chronicles (talk) 15:17, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- Some comments have come on the notice board. But still not clear how to go about it. I am thinking maybe I should delete this section or make a cursory mention of 2 or 3 sentences. Please suggest your views.--Indian Chronicles (talk) 07:25, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- Dropping the section is fine. We just need to make sure that per WP:WEIGHT, we are giving more coverage to the majority viewpoint (2 of 3 sentences). Also the sources we use on the topic should be from:
- * Text books used in top academic programs on the subject or
- * Journals/conference proceedings that are peer reviewed
- * Other sources that fit the WP:RS criteria for reliable sources.
- Someone may choose to expand the section in the future (and that may be good for the article). They just need to stick to the weight and source reliability policies. If you feel you can expand it now within these constraints in a weeks time or so, you are welcome to do so. Otherwise turncating is fine. Articleye (talk) 05:33, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- Some comments have come on the notice board. But still not clear how to go about it. I am thinking maybe I should delete this section or make a cursory mention of 2 or 3 sentences. Please suggest your views.--Indian Chronicles (talk) 07:25, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Delisted
editThanks for volunteering to take on the review of the TM article. I have just delisted the article since editors feel more work could be done. (olive (talk) 18:01, 30 January 2013 (UTC))
Spanish Civil War
editHi Artcileye. I was wondering if you had made a decision regarding the Talk:Spanish Civil War/GA2 reassessment. AIRcorn (talk) 22:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, I haven't had the time to complete the review. I suggest you open it up for community review rather than an individual review as I am unlikely to find time in the near future. Articleye (talk) 12:09, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I left a query at the talk page of the article Karma in Jainism. Its this one: Talk:Karma_in_Jainism#Citation_needed_tags_on_material_theory_section.3F. If possible, please reply to it. Rahul Jain (talk) 04:48, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
editGood article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. |