Artinpl1

Your recent edits

Hello, I'm 220.244.72.99. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Orphrey have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 220.244.72.99 (talk) 09:40, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

2019

Hello! None of your recent edits to Anna Vasa of Sweden appear to be constructive. An edit like this latest one is bound to be looked at as unneccessarily agressive and even disruptive. We all must provide reliable sources. As I've tried to inform you several times now, Facebook is not a reliable source acceptable to Wikipedia. On the talk page there I have named 3 academic authors who go against what you are trying to add with that basically unknown black & white portrait. Please revert yourself, and do so without any more personal slurs! If you do not follow standard Wikipedia guidelines re: reliable sources, you will have to be be reported for administrative review. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:45, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:29, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Guy (Help!) 16:36, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 22:50, 12 August 2019 (UTC)