Aslishiva

Aslishiva, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Aslishiva! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prem Ratan Dhan Payo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Star TV. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Please find better reference

Hi there, I've reverted your edit here for two reasons: 1) Links to the mobile version of websites are often problematic for desktop users, with strange formatting that makes it impossible to read. 2) In this case, the reference doesn't resolve. That is, there's no content that I can see, only a comment window. Please find a better reference. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Welcome back

The reference you have given of IB times in the box office of 72.38 india biz is wrong. That amount is for in 3 days worldwide as clearly mentioned in that report.Please read the reference carefully again Gary0007 (talk) 08:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salman Khan Film (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rankersbo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Aslishiva/Salman Khan Film and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rankersbo (talk) 11:06, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salman Khan Film (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Aslishiva/Salman Khan Film and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salman Khan Film (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Salman Khan Film and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 12:27, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salman Khan Film (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Salman Khan Film and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 12:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 13 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Hero (2015 film) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

BOI and the removal of the Estimation template

Hi, please do not remove the {{Estimation}} template from articles as you did in these edits. Consensus at WP:ICTF was achieved for the inclusion of this template in Indian cinema articles. Secondly, please do not use Box Office India as a reference, as WP:ICTF does not consider it a reliable source. Lastly, please avoid using mobile websites as references, since they don't resolve very well (or at all in some cases) on desktop computers. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:35, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Its vs It's

Hi, if you're going to make edits like these [1][2], which you seem to be doing a lot of, you need to know the difference between "it's" and "its" and use the correct form. Its is possessive and it's is a contraction of "it is".

The kid was happy to help the robot get its hat back.

The robot exclaimed, "It's (it is) a wonderful day for robots!"

So in the linked examples above, when talking about a film's gross, you would not write "On it's eleventh day the film collected ₹1.72 crore" because "it is" wouldn't make sense there. "On it is eleventh day..." Instead, you'd use "its" because you are talking about the film's eleventh day. It is possessive. "On its eleventh day the film collected ₹1.72 crore." Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Please stop using Box Office India

Hi, this is my second note about this. Please stop using Box Office India as a reference as you've done here and here. It is not considered a reliable source by the Indian cinema task force. If you disagree, you are welcome to open a discussion and seek consensus for change at WT:ICTF. If you continue to use this site, the content you submit will be reverted, and you could wind up with your editing privileges interrupted. I would also advise you to familiarize yourself with our guidelines for reliable sources, since it appears from these edits that you are under the impression that any source found on the Internet is reliable. They are not. We're not interested in blogs like this one. We are only interested in reliable published sources that have a reputation for fact-checking and a clear editorial policy. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Third and final request - please stop using Box Office India as a reference.

Hi, this is my last request before I interrupt your editing privileges. Please stop using BOI as a reference as you have again done here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:36, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

I have recently learned that there is an inconsistency of opinion about Box Office India at WP:ICTF, so I am no longer enforcing the guideline that it is an unreliable source. Sorry about that. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:59, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Aslishiva. You have new messages at Cyphoidbomb's talk page.
Message added 17:16, 24 September 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:16, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding promotional content.

Hi, please stop adding promotional content as you have done here and here. There is nothing encyclopedic about a film receiving a standing ovation. It only serves to make the subject look impressive, which is not what we are here to do. If that's what you are here to do, you're in the wrong place. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:48, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Average grosser

Re: this edit, adding statements into articles without any context is not helpful. The film was an 'Average grosser' at the indian box office as it collected ₹33.50 crore (US$4.0 million) nett in its full Theatrical run.[3] Context would include what a high gross would be and/or a low gross, and you should probably attribute the evaluation to a specific source. i.e. "Koimoi described the film as an average grosser for collecting ₹33.5 crore compared to Bazmee's last film, which grossed ₹NN crore." Adding sourced blurbs to articles without any explanation doesn't help the reader understand the content. Note also that Verifiability does not guarantee inclusion. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:30, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Adding personal commentary to article

Please stop adding your personal commentary to articles as you have done here. "Good growth" is subjective phrasing that doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. Note that given your other problematic promotional edits and your reluctance to discuss anything, I'm considering this your final warning on the matter. If you add promotional, editorial or similar promotional language, I will interrupt your editing privileges. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:57, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Capitalization

Please familiarize yourself with MOS:CAPS. You keep creating problems for other editors to fix when you make edits like these: [4][5][6].

Ex: "Second Weekend" should not be capitalized as neither word is a proper noun. It should read "second weekend." "Ten Day" should not be capitalized as neither word is a proper noun. It should read "ten day". The only word in "Second Monday" that should be capitalized is "Monday" because Monday (along with the other days and months) is a proper noun. "Second Tuesday" should be "second Tuesday." Note that competence is required at Wikipedia, and editors do not have time or an obligation to teach you proper English. Creating problems for other editors to fix is disruptive. If English is not your native language, you should consider editing at one of the Wikipedias in your native tongue. Continued problems like this will result in your account being blocked. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:57, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Flop / Blockbuster = meaningless

Please don't add content like this. A film can't be "declared" anything because 1) flop or hit or super-hit or blockbuster are subjective. 2) Even if attributed to a source, it elevates one source's opinion over everybody else's, and attempts to pass off the subjective terminology as a fact. In Western film articles we never say "The film was declared rotten" even though that's the terminology Rotten Tomatoes uses to describe poor critical response. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent introduction of promotional language and content, and very close paraphrasing of existing sources, which presents serious copyright concerns. You have been previously warned that promotional content is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at Prem Ratan Dhan Payo. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:41, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

This block was for this content. You seem to not understand that rather than just parrot what the promotional trade articles say, you need to present content in a responsible, neutral way that can be understood by readers everywhere. Statements like "The film opened to a bumper response all over India." have no meaning without context. Statements like "The film shattered all previous record of opening" which heavily paraphrased from this source is a heavily biased statement. "Shattered"? Really? What's wrong with "Exceeded"? And, I'll point out that the article said "Salman Khan's "Prem Ratan Dhan Payo" (PRDP) has shattered the records of his previous films", not that "The film shattered all previous record of opening". That's a huge difference. And, you asserted, "The film collected ₹40.35 crore (US$4.8 million) nett from hindi version alone on its opening day and emerged as the highest opening day of all time beating the previous record of Happy New Year." But that's not consistent with this same source, which says, "However, the film has failed to beat the records of Shah Rukh Khan's "Happy New Year", which still holds the title of highest opening day grosser." So I'm not sure if this is a reading comprehension problem, but the result is that you are irresponsibly promoting this film instead of writing about it neutrally. This cannot be tolerated. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:54, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 08:26, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Removing reliable references

You have been warned many times in the past. In this edit, You removed references from NDTV and international businesstimes and included koimoi and bollywoodlife. Bollywoodlife is not considered as a reliable source for Bollywood box office. Reputed newspapers, news channels as timesofindia, Indian Express, NDTV, Zee News, India Today Hindustan times are always better sources than these websites. You can add sources from Bollywoodhungama and koimoi, but you shouldn't remove reliable references. --The Avengers 10:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Along with that, stop adding mobile references.The Avengers 10:21, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. You cannot promote one reference over another. Every source which has an Wikipedia article is reliable as Koimoi and also International Business Times, The Economic Times, Business Standard, Bollywood Hungama, India Today , The Financial Express. The Avengers 09:25, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

The honest thing to do would be to present the range of opinion, i.e. ₹390–398 crore^[1][2] This, however, is rarely done since most of the people who feverishly update box office data tend to be pushing an agenda to report the newest, highest numbers. Not helpful. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:11, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Double-check your work

This is sloppy. You need to start double-checking your work. I'm losing patience with your lack of attention to detail. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:16, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:02, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive and promotional editing, which has continued unabated after your previous short block and many, many warnings. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | talk 10:43, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Sir what are the reasons that i was blocked from editing

• Disruption, promotion, ignoring warnings, as I said. I don't know how to explain it any more clearly. You need to read all the warnings you have received on this page. You have completely ignored them. Also please read the report at WP:ANI, which you were alerted to yesterday, just above my block notice. Here it is. I'm sorry it took an indefinite block for you to take an interest in the problems with your editing; you have been told about them often enough, and even blocked briefly before for the exact same problems. Bishonen | talk 11:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC).

Sir please unblock me..i will not do mistakes in future..

• If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Doing it that way will call an uninvolved administrator — somebody other than me — to this page to review whether you should be unblocked or not. Don't forget to read the guide to appealing blocks first, and to explain why you think you should be unblocked. It's not enough to say you won't make mistakes in the future; you must show that you understand what the mistakes were. Because, you know, if you don't understand that, then how can we believe you'll be able to avoid them? Good luck. Bishonen | talk 15:25, 21 December 2015 (UTC).

Draft:Salman Khan Film concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Salman Khan Film, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Salman Khan Film

Hello, Aslishiva. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Salman Khan Film".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 09:07, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Aslishiva. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)