Astrss
Welcome
editHello, Astrss and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students. Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, if your class doesn't already have one.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Helpme}}
before the question.
Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.
It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}}
on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and should be treated accordingly.
We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Lova Falk talk 08:45, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
editMessage added 08:47, 12 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Completing AfD
editHi! I noticed that you tried to nominate Epistemological psychology for deletion, along with an IP. I'm going to assume that you're the IP since the nominations were done so close together? In any case, the reason the AfD tags were removed was because you didn't complete the nomination. In order to proceed with a deletion discussion, we need you to add the following: {{subst:afd2|pg=Epistemological psychology|cat=T|text=}} ~~~~. We also need a rationale for deletion, such as "Unable verify the term to show that this is in use or notable within its field", which seems to essentially be the rationale for the last AfD back in 2007. If we don't have a rationale for deletion in some format, we have to close the AfD as a procedural close. Just in case you aren't the IP, I'll leave a note there as well. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:34, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Social sharing of emotions
editHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Social sharing of emotions you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 20:32, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Social sharing of emotions
editThe article Social sharing of emotions you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Social sharing of emotions for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 01:52, 29 September 2013 (UTC)