February 2019

edit

  Your addition to Draft:ADESA has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. MER-C 20:14, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Atm830! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 20:48, Wednesday, April 28, 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Atm830! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 20:50, Wednesday, April 28, 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steiner + Associates (April 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (talk) 21:15, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Atm830! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:15, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:TEST

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Draft:TEST, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 05:23, 30 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Requesting deletion of the page

edit

In the future, if you want a page you've created (and only you have made major edits to) to be deleted, put {{Db-author}} at the top of the page in question using the source editor. I've gone ahead and tagged Draft:TEST using this method on your behalf (hence the boilerplate notification I've left you informing you of that; although unfortunately it hasn't listed "g7" as a reason). Additionally, in the future; please use the Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 05:28, 30 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Sunnova

edit

Hello, Atm830,

Thank you for creating Sunnova.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for the article! Companies need to meet the notability guideline WP:NCORP, which needs multiple reliable, completely independent, secondary sources that constitute of significant coverage per WP:CORPDEPTH. Other than this which might be WP:SIGCOV, annual reports, profiles, press releases, and routine announcements (1, 2) IMHO fails the SIGCOV requirements. My WP:BEFORE search found lots of sources, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. However, they seem to be mostly routine announcements, press releases, or information on earnings and sells, falling into Examples of trivial coverage per CORPDEPTH. Therefore, I've tagged notability. Also, please make sure that other pages link to this article. Many thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 20:42, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sunnova for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunnova is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunnova until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:40, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply