Atomises
A statement of some sort from you at the above SPI case might help clarify a few things. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 02:31, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
October 2011
edit | Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet
You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger One ping only 22:49, 16 October 2011 (UTC) |
Self-admitted sock of User:Khukri [1] - The Bushranger One ping only 22:50, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Atomises (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please read Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry and explain how I abused multiple accounts? Please read the legitimate uses, and I say that this account as per the description I left on my talkpage was for privacy Atomises (talk) 06:25, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have at least one account (according to you, more than one) and at least one IP address in ways that were evidently intended to give the impression that you were not the same person. Despite your claims that this was done for legitimate reasons, to do with "privacy", nowhere do you appear to have clearly explained what those reasons were, or what the privacy issues were. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.