Atsbi
December 2022
edit
Hello, I'm ToastGuard. I noticed that you recently removed content from Haplogroup C-M217 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Toast (talk) 18:35, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- I did in one of the edit summaries. I was correcting the text according to the citations, there were 2 different genetic studies on different haplogroup clades but someone thought the different citations were talking about the same study and synthesized parts from both of them into an incorrect claim. There are 2 different genetic studies which clash which each other, "Recent Spread of a Y-Chromosomal Lineage in Northern China and Mongolia" and "Y chromosome of Aisin Gioro, the imperial house of the Qing dynasty". They were previously used together and were synthesized into one incorrect paragraph. I split apart the paragraph into content from each study.Atsbi (talk) 20:08, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Blablubbs look at the article in question. Haplogroup C-M217. I'm not asking you to unblock me but to look at the vandalism yourself. Banabakabiroshitha is violating synthesis and original research policies. Reverting corrections by banned users is still vandalism. By the way Banabakabiroshitha is a single purpose account who has only edited one article for years in order to preserve a single paragraph of vandalism and you think that's not suspicious?
Banabakabiroshitha also did this years ago and vandalized the article under different ips with the same content. Look at the citations yourself, they don't agree with what he says.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Haplogroup_C-M217&diff=prev&oldid=778431878
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Haplogroup_C-M217&diff=prev&oldid=754065011
Atsbi (talk) 15:05, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Qiushufang you reverted some of my edits and are not biased towards me. So as a neutral user you can look at the edits on Haplogroup C-M217. Banabakabiroshitha is committing clear violation of original research and vandalism. He's mixing the results of three different genetic studies together and using it to vandalize that article. People aren't allowed to revert even banned accounts if they remove obvious vandalism (which I did). He's also a single purpose account solely dedicated to inserting vandalism into a single article who looks like a sock himself.Atsbi (talk) 17:38, 23 December 2022 (UTC)