Big Court (Court Dog) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Big Court (Court Dog), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:43, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your feedback on this. I will work on citing more sources. AutumnBEA (talk) 05:11, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
The article also has an large number of external links sprinkled throughout the text. Please remove all of them, and convert them to references, if appropriate. Also, I suggest that you submit it the article, when you think it is in better shape, through the WP:AFC process. Happy editing! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:14, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Can do! Where can I find the draftspace? I have been looking for it so that I can make the edits. AutumnBEA (talk) 05:18, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
I found it, never mind. Thank you AutumnBEA (talk) 05:20, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

IMDB & Discogs

edit

Are not considered wp:reliable sources. They are wp:user generated content (UGC) See wp:IMDB and WP:RSDISCOGS Cheers Adakiko (talk) 06:24, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Big Court (Court Dog) (August 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cabrils (talk) 06:24, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi Cabrils, I have resubmitted the article after making some significant edits. May you look it over and inform me anything that may need to be adjusted, added or removed? Additionally, pease advise on everything (if any) that may still prevent this article from being approved. Thank you in advance. AutumnBEA (talk) 07:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
AutumnBEA, you should re-order the sections according to MOS:ORDER. Also, try to maintain a neutral point of view in the text of the article. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:39, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your feedback @MPGuy2824 Mind taking a look at the changes made per your advice? AutumnBEA (talk) 08:01, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Some more suggestions. a) Move infobox to the top, before the lead. b) rewrite the lead according to MOS:LEAD. c) Don't add references to links in the external links section. move them to the article body. d)use bullet points for the external links. e) bold the article name in the lead. f) there is usually much less bolding of content in normal wiki articles. look at Burna Boy, for example. After that, it depends on your sources and whether they meet notability standards. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:14, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, AutumnBEA! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cabrils (talk) 06:24, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Big Court (Court Dog) (August 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 09:29, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Big Court (Court Dog) (October 31)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
 Velella  Velella Talk   13:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Big Court (Court Dog)

edit

  Hello, AutumnBEA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Big Court (Court Dog), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Big Court (Court Dog)

edit
 

Hello, AutumnBEA. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Big Court".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:33, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply