Avanale (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
since I am not Naadapriya. I have not made any edits to support his/her past edits. I just supported the legitimate request by user Kanindian to unprotect the improperly protected article Hogenakkal Falls. Mine is a multi-user computer system. Please see hereAvanale (talk) 07:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
When a new user enters a dispute, taking the side of a banneed user, this makes it seem likely that you are the banned user. Add the fact that you appear to have an IP address which that banned user would be likely to, that makes it almost definite. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:17, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Avanale (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I DID NOT SUPPORT BANNED USER NAADAPRIYA and I will not. Please unblock me
Decline reason:
Your edits make it clear that you are not a new user. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:28, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Avanale (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Yes, I agree that I am not new. I have done some minor constructive editings without an account as allowed by Wikipedia. I opened account to participate more actively. I did/do support the genuine requests of respected active editors such as K pavan2,Kanindian and others which is denied by an administrator repeatedly. Please unblock me and allow me to constructively participate in editing.
Decline reason:
Sorry, I concur with the other two administrators. Even if I did not, however, there would be little I could do about it. This is marked as a checkuser block; you will need to contact them directly for review. The easiest way would be to e-mail the person who blocked you, or to contact arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Thanks. Kuru (talk) 00:42, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{tlx|{unblock | above reason and remedy-procedures conflict with Wikipedia norms. I was blocked for an action that I DID NOT do. I was accused that I supported a banned user which I DID NOT. Please unblock me.}}} Avanale (talk) 06:32, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry you feel it "conflicts with Wikipedia norms". You've been given instructions on the next steps to unblock this account. Kuru (talk) 11:45, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Avanale (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked stating the mistaken reason When a new user enters a dispute, taking the side of a banneed user, this makes it seem likely that you are the banned user I DID NOT and WILL NOT enter a dispute to support a banned user. Please unblock me
Decline reason:
You've been told to discuss this by either emailing the user who blocked you or arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. This is your last chance - further misuse of the unblock template will lead to your ability to edit this page being removed. TNXMan 17:58, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Avanale (talk) 17:26, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Avanale (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked stating the mistaken reason When a new user enters a dispute, taking the side of a banneed user, this makes it seem likely that you are the banned user I DID NOT and WILL NOT enter a dispute to support a banned user. Please unblock me
Decline reason:
You've already been told to take this up with checkuser, per previous instructions. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:33, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.