Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of the Alamo, you may be blocked from editing. Bzuk (talk) 19:38, 3 September 2010 (UTC) This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Howard Hughes, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bzuk (talk) 19:38, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply


OK I WILL STOP!!! I WAS JUST DELETING THIS MESSAGE SO IT WOULDN'T KEEP POPPING UP ON ME!!!!!!!!!!!

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aviationperson (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am very sorry of my account being used for vandalism. I left my computer while I was still logged on Wikipedia and a couple of my friends decided to be jerks, so they just went around and changed stuff. The only thing I changed was on the Sound of the Natural State page. Again I am very sorry about this.

Decline reason:

You're responsible for the actions of your account. And the edit you mention is also vandalism, so I'm not inclined to believe you in any case. Hersfold (t/a/c) 19:55, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, the first one was. The second one may have been constructive, but that still doesn't excuse the other edits. Hersfold (t/a/c) 19:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aviationperson (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The last edit I made was not vandalism just to let you know. I am in the Arkansas State marching band. I play the sousaphone, so I think I would know what our halftime show is. I can understand about my account being my responsibility. I can assure you that it will never happen again.

Decline reason:

The "my little brother did it" excuse won't wash here. Your account was created at 18:52. One minute later it made this edit and four minutes after that this one. And you expect us to believe that wasn't you? JohnCD (talk) 20:18, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The problem here is that we have no idea if you are still in control of your account or not. And furthermore, we have no way of knowing if you were in fact the person who made those edits in the first place. Hersfold (t/a/c) 20:08, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ok I can understand that, but as I just said before. I can assure you that I am the real user of this account and that I did not make those changes except for the Sound of the Natural State which is true.

How come the first-ever edit from your account, one minute after it was created, was made by somebody else? JohnCD (talk) 20:25, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aviationperson (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Ok I will admit that I was the one to make those changes if thats what you want. I was just messing around on the edit section trying to figure it out, I didnt mean to press save page. But the last edit I made is true. I was just trying to contribute to the page. It said it would be updated in Fall 2010, so I figured that since I knew what the halftime show was, I would put it in there. I was just trying to help. I am very sorry about the other edits.

Decline reason:

I have reviewed your contribution history, and I was not able to find any evidence that unblocking this account will be likely to result in a better encyclopedia. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:46, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


How long will the block last?


{{unblock|I will not vandalize again. NEVER!! }

You made the choice to be blocked by choosing vandalism, and we all respect that choice fully. I was the third administrator to review this block and support your choice to be blocked. I don't think that any further reviews are going to yield a different response, or serve any purpose that will make the encyclopedia better, so I've disabled your talk page access in order to help you move on with your life as a non-Wikipedia-editor. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:05, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply