Avitalourcrowd

Welcome!

Hello, Avitalourcrowd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! South Nashua (talk) 13:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to OurCrowd has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: OurCrowd was changed by Avitalourcrowd (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87699 on 2017-03-28T11:04:54+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:04, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Avitalourcrowd. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article OurCrowd, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Kleuske (talk) 13:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Hello, I'm Kleuske. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to OurCrowd have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Kleuske (talk) 11:21, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Avitalourcrowd (talk) 08:46, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Hi Kleuske, trying to figure out what I've done wrong. what are the articles you think are promotional? the OurCrowd page is really out of date. it needs a lot of work. please send me your input and your recommendations for the right way to update this page and specifics on what was wrong. thank you. Avital

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Kleuske (talk) 11:24, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at OurCrowd. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 08:28, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Avitalourcrowd. You have new messages at 331dot's talk page.
Message added 08:46, 18 April 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

331dot (talk) 08:46, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at OurCrowd, you may be blocked from editing. –Davey2010^Talk 14:13, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

OurCrowd

Don't mean to be disruptive. just trying to edit. I understand I'm doing something wrong. please advise what part of the edit I've done is disruptive. thank you.

(talk page stalker) Most of it. - Addition of promotional-sounding content, i.e. making it sound like an advert. See WP:NOTPROMOTION. Addition of wp:puffery. Use an encyclopedic wp:tone. Please sign your talk posts. See above. Jim1138 (talk) 06:36, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:38, 29 July 2017 (UTC)