Awsomeness1579

March 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Treaty of Nanking have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Treaty of Nanking was changed by Awsomeness1579 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890852 on 2021-03-15T18:14:15+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Treaty of Nanking. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RacoonyRE (talk) 18:18, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mattibigboi (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mattibigboi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mattibigboi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Awsomeness1579! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mattibigboi

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Mattibigboi. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Please be aware that repeated vandalism editing is normally a reason for the vandalising editor to be banned from this site. And bear in mind that wikipedia has, in this situation, no sense of humour.----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:50, 16 March 2021 (UTC)