Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Flyway

edit

I've checked your 4 sources so far - I've suggested one alternate, and validated the magazine, and proposed for further research the other three. Please do not be in a hurry to get this article approved. It will take time - as time goes on, additional sources will become available. --Lexein (talk) 18:04, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

AfC

edit

Some topics require more time to find sources. This subject may develop more reliable sources soon, especially if it get play, or comparative reviews, in major-ish publications. I understand the frustration. I made notes in your References section about which sources were definitely RS, and only found one. The others are too questionable to assert as RS at the moment. As soon as those sources are cited by other authors, then their reliability goes up, which helps your article. WP:RS WP:V. --Lexein (talk) 23:44, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Flyway (software)

edit

Hello, Axel.fontaine. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Flyway (software), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Smirkybec (talk) 09:13, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply