AfC notification: Draft:Azizi Developments has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Azizi Developments. Thanks! — Stevey7788 (talk) 13:03, 9 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azizi Developments (May 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 14:09, 9 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Ayah Osama fgs! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (barksniff) 14:09, 9 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azizi Developments (May 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SamHolt6 (talk) 02:13, 13 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Editing with a possible conflict of interest

edit
 

Hello Ayah Osama fgs. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ayah Osama fgs. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ayah Osama fgs|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.

Removing AfC reviewer comments

edit

Please refrain from removing AfC reviewer's comments, as you did here [1]. This is considered to be WP:DISRUPTIVE. Thank you.--SamHolt6 (talk) 02:16, 13 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azizi Developments (May 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:54, 14 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azizi Developments (June 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by SamHolt6 were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Declining; tone has improved, but the article (given credible off-wiki evidence and a lack of response to COI/PAID inquests) continues to be promote the subject in an undue way and has been created contrary to WP:NOT. Even should these concerns be address, the previously-raised WP:NCORP issue remains unaddressed; as such, I am rejecting the topic as contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
SamHolt6 (talk) 00:56, 15 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Azizi Developments concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Azizi Developments, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 26 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Azizi Developments

edit
 

Hello, Ayah Osama fgs. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Azizi Developments".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:11, 26 February 2020 (UTC)Reply