Ayushbamb

Raja Pantham moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Raja Pantham, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 18:42, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

Hello Ayushbamb. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Raja Pantham, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ayushbamb. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ayushbamb|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Sam Kuru (talk) 21:34, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi Sam Kuru, I am not being directly or indirectly paid or being compensated for my edits. I have been studying about this person lately and I believed that this person does deserve a wiki page. The content published was supposed to be a draft while I was figuring out more citations with reliable sources for the same. However, if Wikipedia team believes that this is not enough, I would like to remove the page completely so as to make sure that this suits the guidelines set by Wikipedia. Ayushbamb (talk) 07:44, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi Sam Kuru,

I believe the texts taken from the external sources mention texts that are in a promoting manner.

Should I re-phrase the content for this in accordance to wiki guidelines of the neutral tone?

Will I be allowed to edit the text from source to make it in the neutral tone of wiki guidelines? Ayushbamb (talk) 17:06, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Using a sock account or another person associated with your company is unacceptable. I have locked both accounts until there is a more transparent answer to my query above, and some explanation of your actions that isn't a fabrication. Sam Kuru (talk) 14:06, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi Sam Kuru,

We have not fabricated any facts. As i mentioned earlier, i have gone through the person's biography, his articles, news and TedX speechs and I believed that the person deserved a Wikipedia page.

My friend (the other account) has re-written the entire article keeping all the Wikipedia guidelines (special attention given to the neutral, non-promoting tone) in mind and has also mentioned all the references which are reliable and of independent sources.

Requesting you to kindly have a look and let us know if we are wrong anywhere.

Also requesting you to kindly unlock our accounts.

Regards,

Ayush Ayushbamb (talk) 14:44, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

No. I have no desire to out you and your "company", but you are not welcome to edit here as long as you are unable to act with integrity. Sam Kuru (talk) 15:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi Sam Kuru,

I assure you that we will act with complete integrity henceforth,

Moreover, i shall even request for your assistance on draft pages going forward so as to make sure that any article that i believe are noteworthy, should be reviewed before i put them into submission. Ayushbamb (talk) 15:26, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi Sam Kuru,

Requesting you to kindly unblock us so that we can make changes and you can monitor those changes for true integrity.

Regards,

Ayush Ayushbamb (talk) 16:38, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #76479 has been closed, with an instruction that any unblock request should be made on this page. To make such a request, first read the guide to appealing blocks, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of this page, replacing the words "Your reason here" with appropriate text. JBW (talk) 15:59, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ayushbamb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believed that the a person was notable enough to have a wiki page, however, I was blocked after submitting more links and references, moreover, one admin believed that it was wrong and i was blocked, i even added to my user page that i shall be more careful in the following time. Ayushbamb (talk) 15:40, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It would have been better had you not created a block-evading sock with User:Spoofinsaan. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:12, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ayushbamb (talk) 15:40, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi --jpgordon, I was told by Sam Kuru "In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message." and i was awaiting his reply, meanwhile i gave the article to me friend (the other account User:Spoofinsaan) who had re-written the entire article keeping all the Wikipedia guidelines (special attention given to the neutral, non-promoting tone) in mind and he has also mentioned all the references which are reliable and of independent sources, however he put the draft into submission that too 35 days after my reply to Sam Kuru, while i was still awaiting his reply to allow me to make changes. I have also mentioned that going forward, i shall take more assistance by admins so at to make sure that any article that i believe are noteworthy, should be reviewed before i put them into submission. Hence, Requesting you to kindly unblock us so that we can make changes and you can monitor those changes for true integrity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayushbamb (talk • contribs) 16:39, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi --jpgordon, Requesting the above Ayushbamb (talk) 09:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

That sounds pretty sneaky. "Oh, can't edit cause the PAID warning"-- then you hand it off to a colleague? It's sock puppetry. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:59, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Cross-posting UTRS appeal #77248 for relevant content there. (Spoofinsaan) -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:06, 11 August 2023 (UTC)