Az7997

March 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pearl Jam. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 00:24, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

And this is why I don't contribute content or money to wikipedia. Your canned comment above is insulting. Your arbitrary rule for two artists is not linked to any resource above. It is not uniformly applied across wikipedia, as your trolling of content by hand is the only reason it's enforced. There is no clear way for me to see that you aren't making up this arbitrary rule (from what you've provided), so my options are to start a revert war or insult you back here. How can a gold-selling supergroup with only 5 members NOT be an associated act? Yet, because Niel Young has a rotating cast of characters in his big-band, he gets a paragraph for associated acts? How am I supposed to respond to this wikipedia-idoicy other than leaving and not contributing? Az7997 (talk) 12:36, 13 March 2022 (UTC)