Azadsp
April 2014
edit | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 01:16, 6 April 2014 (UTC) |
Azadsp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
your reason here Azadsp (talk) 06:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Seems pretty clear from here, the SPI, and the frwiki discussion that you're the same editor. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:23, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello Dear Drmies,
Respectfully,
Concerning the blockage my user account, I would be so grateful to you, if you could tell me your reason for it. I added some editing with their reliable references. It means usage for illegitimate reasons? I'm new in wikipedia and may be I have not observed a rule of Wikipedia, but you could notify me instead of blocking indefinitely. My purpose is just contribution. Best Regards Azadsp (talk) 06:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Yes--I'm a bit late in responding, sorry, because I was filing an SPI (an investigation request) on you and your multiple accounts, and then I was looking at your contributions on the other wikis (FA and FR). Anyway, that you are abusing multiple accounts is clear as day, and they're kind of obvious, what with the rankings of Sorbonne 6 and that screenshot that was copied from a website, so I don't think there's much explaining to do here. Thanks, and all the best, Drmies (talk) 14:38, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
What you're talking about rankings of Sorbonne 6 (i.e. This File), is not a screenshot from the web. This file is own work (created by excel file and after that screenshot from it) according to this data. You cannot find this file on the web. I don't know why you removed this file. The other file that I uploaded is here. This is my personal Master's degree. So, I think my only mistake is using multiple user account that I can use one of them after this.
Thanks
Best Regards --Azadsp (talk) 15:15, 6 April 2014 (UTC)