Recent edit to Tlemcen Province

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tlemcen Province, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 17:16, 24 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm M.Bitton. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Raï, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 22:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Cheba Zohra

edit

Hello AzerDazer,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cheba Zohra for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 02:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Cheba Zohra moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Cheba Zohra, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Thjarkur (talk) 09:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Zohra appears notable, but biographies need sources. Examples of good sources to use would be newspaper coverage and large interviews in newspapers. We try to make sure that every single statement (especially in biographies) can be verified in the cited sources. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, it's very easy or even automatic to add citations if you're citing a webpage, you just need the URL. Thank you :) – Thjarkur (talk) 09:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Cheba Zohra moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Cheba Zohra, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Fiddle Faddle 22:53, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Cheba Zohra has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cheba Zohra. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 22:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Cheba Zohra

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Cheba Zohra, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. VAXIDICAE💉 00:43, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply