Aztlshamb

Hi, if you wanna talk, know that if you write here, in this page, then I will answer here and I expect to continue the talk here. If I write in other page, then by all means it is up to you to follow the conversation there or here. But just to you know, sometimes I don´t access Wikipedia very often. Aztlshamb (talk) 23:37, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Invitation for comment

Hi, as you have been involved in that article (hopefully you still is keeping the interest), you are invited to this, as yet, non-consensual and critical talk. See you there, Excalibursword (talk) 17:03, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Ethernal beings

The article is back again, since there was no consensus to redirect it, that out of process, and is now at AFD. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethereal beings I'm contacting everyone who participated in the discussion previously, who hasn't been told yet. Dream Focus 14:02, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Sorry guys I couldn’t see just in time your request. Anyway I have read the discussion and by all means that was completely absurd. In fact the article had very good redaction, excellent content, and more than plentiful reliable sources. No doubt that is the biggest failure of Wikipedia. I mean, if exits a crazy crowd that doesn’t like an article, then it is inevitably doomed to deletion discussion and from that point we have a ridiculous lottery like that to determine its fate and where the rules are practically meaningless. As is customary the reality is that currently there is no safe space in Wikipedia to certain articles doesn’t matter which kind be they or how well finished they are. Sorry again, may be some day things will be better, ... or not. Aztlshamb (talk) 15:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Black Sun (mythology) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black Sun (mythology) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Sun (mythology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ^{[Username Needed]} 11:03, 31 October 2018 (UTC)