Azusa2
Please use Preview button and edit summary
editThank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 09:12, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 09:12, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Unexplained deletion of material
editPlease do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chūō Main Line, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 23:04, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Please use Preview button and edit summary (again)
editRegarding your latest edit to E233 series, I would once again ask that you use the preview button before you save. This will save yourself and other editors from having to clear up errors afterwards. You have done this a number of times now. I would also once again ask that you please provide an edit summary. Without this, it is sometimes difficult to determine whether your edits are in good faith or vandalism. Please take the time to read this and be more communicative. --DAJF (talk) 07:19, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Unexplained deletion of material (again)
editPlease stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Chūō Main Line, you will be blocked from editing. --DAJF (talk) 07:22, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Invitation to Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains in Japan
editHello Azusa2,
I invite you to go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains in Japan. You can join the project, or just talk about articles.
Best regards,
Chūō Line Rapid
editHi. I reverted the last edits you made to the Chūō Line Rapid for the following reasons...
- The image at the top showed an E233 series train on a test run on the Yokosuka Line. This has little relevance to an article about Chūō Line Rapid trains, which is why I replaced it with one that shows an E233 series train on a Rapid service on the Chūō Line. Don't you think that makes more sense?
- As this is an article about a train service, there is no need to add infrastructure details such as line voltage or track gauge. (I also think the station list is unnecesary, which is why I tagged it.)
- Despite being asked twice before, you do not provide an edit summary with your edits, which makes it difficult to determine whether they are actually in good faith or intentionally disruptive.
--DAJF (talk) 11:19, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Chūō Line Rapid. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 14:56, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Chūō Line Rapid, you will be blocked from editing. --DAJF (talk) 15:22, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Chūō Main Line
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Chūō Main Line. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 09:04, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Chūō Rapid Line
editPlease stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Chūō Rapid Line, you will be blocked from editing. --DAJF (talk) 09:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
March 2008
editThis is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Chūō Rapid Line. Sceptre (talk) 02:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Chuo Rapid Line
editI reverted the edit you made regarding station for the following reason :
- I changed the stations area to reflect that some trains do start at Musashi Koganei (2183B and 656B for example). For some unspecificed reason, you removed those changes.
Please check the factual accuracy before removing things.
Unexplained removal of material from Azusa (train)
editPlease do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Azusa (train), without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Please also note that your habit of making large numbers of edits and self-reverts to pages without any explanation in the Edit summary continues to be extremely disruptive. PLEASE use the Preview function first. --DAJF (talk) 06:52, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)