BChezzHuman

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel N. Baker (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel N. Baker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Draft links

Per WP:LINKSTYLE, please do not link to Draft pages in the main article namespace. --Regards, James(^talk/_contribs) 20:26, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Frank L. Meyskens, Jr. has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Frank L. Meyskens, Jr.. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 07:02, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank L. Meyskens, Jr. has been accepted

Frank L. Meyskens, Jr., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 16:03, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel N. Baker has been accepted

Daniel N. Baker, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 16:15, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

academic bios

I accepted your two academic bios, because they meet the basic requirements of WWP:PROF, by holding adistinguished chair at a major research university.

But the bios are very incomplete. Please add information as indicated below, and, if you should do any more, do them fully in the first place. The accepted pattern is:

They need to start off first with a biographical section, giving their birthplace and a date, schools and dates from high school on, positions and dates, all in chronological order, not inverse chronological order. This has to be in the text, not just the infobox. Only the most important goes in the infobox. Then a section describing their research, linking not just to their own work but to articles about their work from other people as well.

Then a section on major awards, by which we mean national-level awards, and elected Fellowships of national associations, presidencies of national organizations, and editor-in-chief positions for journals. In-college awards should not be included , nor student awards. The awards have to be given in the article--you cannot refer elsewhere to a list. They go in the text, only the one or two most important go in the infobox as well. The refs have to be given according to WP:REFBEGIN.

Then, if their notability depends mainly on published books, list every such book, linking to their description in WorldCat, not the publisher or Amazon. Include links to reviews--published reviews in reliable sources (I usually try to give every such review I can find in an academic journal of major reliable publication like the NYT.) If notability depends on articles, still give whatever books there are, and give the 4 or 5 most heavily cited peer-reviewed articles along with the citation count, taking the data preferable from Web of Science, or if necessary google Scholar. We normally do not include articles if there are also numerous books, unless there is one or two of special importance. We never include book chapters, lectures, speeches , posters, or the like. Major book and article awards should of course be referred to.

As matters of style: We link to all institution and society names and places the first time they appear--we link to all specific major concept names also--one time only. We do not link to dates. We link to the names of other people if they have a WP article. References need to show in standard bibliographic format the full references, both to print and online versions if both exist. If there is an open access version, it should be indicated as well. An external link is necessary to the person's official web site at the university. Make absolutely certain that nothing at all is copied from there or any other previous publication or web site. DGG ( talk ) 16:42, 28 December 2015 (UTC)