BPBomber

Image copyright problem with Image:Hugo.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Hugo.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Copyright issue with Conditioned reinforcer

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Conditioned reinforcer, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.psychology.uiowa.edu/Faculty/wasserman/Glossary/reinforcement.html. As a copyright violation, Conditioned reinforcer appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Conditioned reinforcer has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Conditioned reinforcer. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Conditioned reinforcer, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Elkman - (Elkspeak) 19:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

• It's fixed now. As long as you write an article in your own words and cite the sources that you're using, it's proper to use those sources. (Wikipedia:Reliable sources has a lot more to say about this.) Thanks for fixing the article. --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 20:46, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:BrelandOtter_f.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BrelandOtter_f.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Dieta2004-03-kieg1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dieta2004-03-kieg1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:17, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Keller Breland

Your enthusiasm in creating an article on Keller Breland is great. The man really deserves recognition. Unfortunately, the article you created was a serious copyright violation. Most of the material comes word for word from an American Psychologist article (reprinted with permission in the Encyclopedia of Arkansas [1]). Maybe that's not your fault. Maybe you got it from some other site that had violated copyright. Regardless, Wikipedia policy says that material has to go. We had to gut the article. We'd have to paraphrase everything, rearrange material, leave some stuff out, and insert any sources other than those used by Gillaspy & Bihm, the original authors. If you have time for any of that, that would be fantastic because Keller certainly deserves his own article. (Paraphrasing alone isn't sufficient. The article has to be structurally different to avoid copyright violation.) Even if you don't, I felt that as a courtesy and because I do appreciate your interest in Keller, I should let you know what we had to do with the article. Doczilla 17:47, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Dieta2004-03-kieg1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dieta2004-03-kieg1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:31, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:BrelandOtter f.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BrelandOtter f.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Marian Breland.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Marian Breland.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 03:26, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rodger Berman

A tag has been placed on Rodger Berman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 15:05, 30 July 2009 (UTC)