BWernham
|
Syd Barrett
editI reverted your changes to Syd Barrett and The Gnome, but didn't have much space in the edit summary to explain. In case you wish to try to make the changes again, here is some advice.
The article used for citation mentions the "Little Grey Men" book as something that appeared at Barrett's funeral. (It actually says an illustration from the book was used, not the book itself.) It says nothing about his father reading it to him. It may be that the biography book about Barrett described in the linked article says this, but if that's the case, you need to cite the book itself, not the web page, and you need to make it clear that this information comes directly from the book.
"When young, Barrett's father used to read to him and his sister...: - this sounds like it's saying: when Barrett's father was young, which I don't think is what you meant.
As for the claim that the book inspired Barrett's writings directly, even in the biography actually claims this, I find it dubious, because it sounds like it's just the author's guess. There is no reference to an interview where Barrett himself makes this connection, which would justify including this section. The whole phrase reads like storybook purple prose, and really isn't properly biographic. How does the author know all about Barrett's "sense of fantasy and escape from reality"; is this just a biographer's puff piece? Again, if Barrett himself said this, it would make sense to quote him in the article. It's not appropriate to quote a biographer's unsupported theory.
By the way, the lyrics to "Matilda Mother" do suggest his being enchanted by stories read to him by his mother, not his father, but even that isn't proof of anything. One could say it's just a song lyric that could be about anyone's life, and not an autobiography.
Regarding Barrett and his sister being given piano lessons, I can't figure out which citation backs this up. The first citation which follows this statement (an existing citation, and appearing after another sentence about a different topic) appears to be a dead link. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 13:58, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- I edited the addition to Denys Watkins-Pitchford down to saying simply that LGM was one of his favorite books and that it was read from at his funeral, which is what the source says. If you can find some citations for the rest, feel free to add things back. Gnomes do seem to be a special British fascination; perhaps LGM is one of the reasons for that, but I certainly don't know enough about the subject to say. Brianyoumans (talk) 15:30, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Really good points - thanks for this. I know that original research cannot be used, but I have my (unpublished) sources for this. It is useful at least to note LGM. He also liked the Hobbit and LOTR, but LGM seems very close to "The Gnome"..... I will get back back when I have something firmer... BWernham (talk) 19:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of The New Man
edit
A tag has been placed on The New Man requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 07:56, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
January 2013
edit
Hello, I'm Happysailor. Your recent edit to the page Gillian McKeith appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, - Happysailor (Talk) 07:48, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Philip Rutnam
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Philip Rutnam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Makecat 13:54, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 9
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lutèce (restaurant), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathon Man (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 26
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited LaSalle (automobile), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Double Indemnity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Your Hawass edit
editHi - sources need to discuss the subject, and the source doesn't mention Hawass, so I've reverted you there. Just wanted to explain why. Dougweller (talk) 09:16, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
edit
Please do not add or change content, as you did to 122 Leadenhall Street, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. A personal weblog is not a reliable source, per WP:BLOGS. McGeddon (talk) 15:16, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, BWernham. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit Hello, BWernham. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit Hello, BWernham. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)