User:Alison/Imagelink User:Alison/Imagelink User:Alison/Imagelink User:Alison/Imagelink User:Alison/Imagelink
User Talk Contribs Sandbox Email

Hello BaRiMzI, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Alison 03:17, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Comments removed. --BaRiMzI 16:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hell Rell sources needed

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Hell Rell, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! RFerreira 04:49, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


Microsoft PowerPoint

edit

Hi BaRiMzl. You wrote: "There was no version 7.0 made for mac to coincide with version 7.0 for windows, PowerPoint 97.". I'm confused, version 7.0 for windows and PowerPoint 97 (windows?) are two successive versions. Do you mean: "..coincide with version 7.0 for windows and was therefore called PowerPoint 98."?? Regards Necessary Evil 17:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:GodsProject.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:GodsProject.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Belated welcome indeed. Thank you for keeping your cool just now, BTW. I just spotted this on your userpage; "I am currently majoring in Graphic Design" - guess I don't need to say anything to you about colour correction! :-) - Alison 03:17, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

WUSF-FM?

edit

I have never heard of the station in the Tampa Bay area.

If WUSF-FM did not have enough classical music fans, why did they not support the station that is already owned by USF? That would be ridiculous. I wonder if they ignored WUSF-FM in the Tampa Bay area for no apparent reason, but are there people listening to classical music on WUSF?

--4.160.216.223 22:13, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I couldn't tell you. I go to the St. Pete campus and have never heard the station. Really, i only did minor structuring changes for the article to better it.--BaRiMzI 02:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well, thanks. But, I had asked you if there is a market for an full-time classical music radio station in the Tampa Bay area, and the Midwest, I had no answer at all.

Sorry, i really can't answer your question. I'm still new to the area and am not one to listen to the radio. I would suggest search for it on google or yahoo. That may help.--BaRiMzI 01:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I tried searching on Google for a classical music radio station in the Tampa Bay area, but I came up with nothing, perhaps you have never owned an radio? - Can anyone create a new article called uh, WUSF-FM.

--4.188.98.63 07:36, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I don't think a new article is necessary. It may be best to simply add a section to the WUSF page as it talks about WUSF-FM and WUSF-TV. That would get the ball rolling, so to speak. I would suggest adding information about the station in the main page and taking it from there. Also, if you add the section I may be able to add on to it from there. --BaRiMzI 20:44, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

AIV

edit

  Thank you for making a report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. Jmlk17 21:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism on DJ Khaled

edit

I thought I should let you know that all of the vandalism on DJ Khaled has been deleted and every one of the vandals have been given warnings. HappiestCamper 16:04, 8 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

replay to message - shadyaftrmathgunit

edit

sorry about not telling you about my edits to the The diplomates template.--Shadyaftrmathgunit 22:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Third Opinion

edit

Please see WT:3O for my response. --User:Krator (t c) 23:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

re message - shadyaftrmathgunit

edit

Thank, i plan to make a template for every dipset memebers so ican shorten the dipset template.--Shadyaftrmathgunit 16:25, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

dipset

edit

I jsu want to say good jobd on your edits to dipset. keep it up--Shadyaftrmathgunit 23:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Courtesy Curtis/Shade Of Black

edit

Did you change the info in the Courtesy Curtis to say the ablums name is called shade of black, if you did the album is not called shade of black, the source stated in the article says its called Courtesy Curtis

, if you did this why didnt you change the page name.--Shadyaftrmathgunit 18:14, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

63.215.28.117

edit

I blocked him for 24 hours, but next time you take a vandal to AIV make sure he's been warned the requisite number of times that day. Or at least once, in this guy's case. Daniel Case 19:35, 15 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

AIV report

edit

  Thank you for making a report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. In this case, it was because no warnings were given to 76.239.0.25 until after edits in question had happened.--Chaser - T 01:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Do not report vandals to AIV unless they have been warned for their vandalism/spamming. Please make sure you give a vandal at least the 3 final warnings, i.e. levels 2, 3, and 4 (see WP:UTM), before reporting them. Thank you, Anas talk? 16:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wikiproject:G-Unit Records

edit

Hi, There is a proposed WikiProject for G-Unit Records.

Please add your name to the list if you are interested.

See--WikiProject:G-Unit Records

--Shadyaftrmathgunit 20:18, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reports to AIV

edit

Thanks for helping revert vandalism and other edits that are not proper to Wikipedia, but as several other admins have pointed out, please only report editors an anonymous IPs that have been properly warned. With your last report, there were no warnings issued and the edits in question were days ago. I removed the links in question, but you should just remove them instead of reporting them immediately. I strongly suggest that you read Wikipedia:Guide to administrator intervention against vandalism before you send in another report. Thanks! -- Gogo Dodo 16:51, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

About your two recent reports [1] [2], they were not vandalism and the edits happened a long time ago. Please only report current issues of obvious vandalism to WP:AIV. As I mentioned before, I strongly recommend that you read Wikipedia:Guide to administrator intervention against vandalism. -- Gogo Dodo 04:46, 21 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wikiproject g-unit started

edit

The G-Unit wikiproject has been started, to view it click here-Wikipedia:WikiProject G-Unit Records.--Shadyaftrmathgunit 22:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Invite

edit
 
Century Tower

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of University of Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

Nomination of The Crow's Nest (University of South Florida St. Petersburg) for deletion

edit

A discussion has begun about whether the article The Crow's Nest (University of South Florida St. Petersburg), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Crow's Nest (University of South Florida St. Petersburg) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 00:32, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply