Your submission at Articles for creation: Srushti Deshmukh has been accepted

edit
 
Srushti Deshmukh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DIVINE 📪 19:36, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Safin Hasan (June 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:29, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, BabuBhai00! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:29, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Srushti Deshmukh

edit
 

The article Srushti Deshmukh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBIO as notable only for one event (coming first in an exam)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:36, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm updating her more information please give me 5/6 hrs BabuBhai00 (talk) 08:38, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2022

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Srushti Deshmukh has been reverted.
Your edit here to Srushti Deshmukh was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/Srushti_IAS) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:51, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Srushti Deshmukh. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Rather than fixing the issue, you've made it worse by adding more references. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:33, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Srushti Deshmukh for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Srushti Deshmukh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srushti Deshmukh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Melcous (talk) 13:40, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'll improve the information on Srushti Deshmukh please give me 3/4 days I'll re-submit the article for review please don't delete just give me some time BabuBhai00 (talk) 17:13, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
As you have a declared conflict of interest you should have used the articles for creation process and submitted it for review before it was published in the first place. The deletion discussion will continue for now regardless. You are welcome to improve the article while that is happening, but I can't imagine it will change the core issue, which is notability. Melcous (talk) 07:34, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
can you help me to solve the issue? BabuBhai00 (talk) 09:37, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
No, I can't because I do not believe the person meets wikipedia's notability criteria. Melcous (talk) 11:22, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
she fulfills all the criteria for wikipedia it just that I'm not able to draft it properly i'm not getting where i'm not making mistakes. you can google about her and you'll get the idea
so i request you to please help me and help me to save the article BabuBhai00 (talk) 13:36, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest

edit

Hi. I see on your user page that you've declared a conflict of interest with the subjects of three articles, one about a magistrate, one about a police officer and one about an actress. I am assuming it is not because you know these people personally? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:59, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

i know them personally they all are my good friends that's why I'm writing behalf of them BabuBhai00 (talk) 15:52, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:DiggisMusic per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DiggisMusic. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit (blether) 21:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply