Backmeupof2

Content blanking

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to KC Concepcion, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Euryalus (talk) 03:35, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to KC Concepcion. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Jclemens (talk) 04:11, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Bea Alonzo. Jclemens (talk) 04:15, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi. I notice your edit summary explanation for blanking most of the KC Concepcion article was that it lacked a neutral point of view. With respect, I cannot see how details such as her parents names lack a neutral presentation. You also removed a great deal of referenced material, confirming aspects of the article.

If there are individual statements in the article you think are not neutrally presented, you are welcome to amend them with appropriate references attached. If you think entire sections are not neutrally presented, you are also free to discuss these on the article talk page and seek consensus for changes. But please stop deleting entire sections of sourced content without explanation - it appears to be vandalism and will swiftly get you blocked from editing.

Let me know if any of this is unclear. Euryalus (talk) 04:54, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Review of edits

AS requested I had a quick look, I know nothing about the subject so these are style and tone comments.

1. We no longer link dates, and we do not put leading "0" s (except when we uses 2008-01-05 - which is not often) so 5 May 2008 or May 5, 2008.
2. You inserted "was scheduled to"; that implies she didn't actually go, or went at a different time.
3. You removed the caption form a picture. This seems odd.
4. Avoid "in fact" - verbiage like "Please note " or "it is important to note"
5. You replicated a reference in the notes list
6. I could see no reason to rename Notes to Further reading.

Rich Farmbrough, 10:14 24 October 2008 (UTC).