BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı

Welcome

Hello, BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Samsun Clashes (1920), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Feellingfly (talk) 11:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Samsun Clashes (1920)

The article Samsun Clashes (1920) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable and poorly referenced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Feellingfly (talk) 11:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

This article shouldn't be deleted and i think this article may be important for Turkish War of Independence. Really nobody talked about Anglo-Turkish war until I created this page. This page helps to learn more about the Turkish War of Independence. BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı (talk) 11:18, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Persistent pov pushing of pseudo-history

Already forgot this? [1] [2]. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Baharatlı, you've already been warned about the extended-confirmed restriction on "politics, ethnic relations, and conflicts involving Armenia, Azerbaijan, or both—broadly construed and explicitly including the Armenian genocide". Some of your recent edits have violated this restriction (e.g., 1, 2). If these continue, you risk being blocked or topic banned. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:36, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

What? My edits has nothing to do with the Armenian Genocide. 1st one is just numbers of soldiers with citations and the 2nd one is just the beligrents. Getting punishment for that is ridicilous. BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı (talk) 17:11, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

You haven't gotten punishment, just a warning. Your ability to comply with this restriction is going to be dependent on you understanding it. I can answer questions, but I can't read it for you. You have to read it. Is it limited to just the Armenian genocide? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Hmmmm.... Just want to ask something. I used a citation in my first edit. And when I read WP:AA, i did not see any problem in my edit. And the second one is just belligrents. BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı (talk) 17:21, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

This is not a comment on the quality of your edits. You could cite and summarize the world's most respected scholar on a conflict involving Armenia, and it would still be a violation. The disruption in this area has been severe enough that the community implemented this broad restriction, knowing that it would prevent some good edits. Please edit constructively in other areas until you've been around for 30 days and made at least 500 edits. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Oh, ok. I understood. BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı (talk) 17:24, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Also, i found that someone trying to call me a "sockpuppet" in here. I am just started to use this account because i lost BaharatlıCheetos2.0 account. BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı (talk) 17:24, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Can you please mention that on your userpage? I'll edit the userpage of your old account. Feel free to mention this at the sockpuppet investigation. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:27, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Did I had a sockpuppet investigation? I did not know that. BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı (talk) 17:29, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, yes. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BaharatlıCheetos2.0. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violations of the extended-confirmed restriction; general sanctions enforcement (WP:GS/AA), as you did at Franco–Turkish War. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:21, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve Greek war crimes

Hello, BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı,

Thank you for creating Greek war crimes.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article appears to be written from a Turkish point of view with a longstanding ethnic axe to grind and needs more sources and perspectives to represent an encyclopedic view of the subject.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:19, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback, but, this page has nothing to do with the Anti-Greek sentiment. I am just writing Greek war crimes there. And yes, the page must be improved. BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı (talk) 16:49, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

The tone of the article is very biased towards a turkish point of view. Insanityclown1 (talk) 20:23, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 22:15, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Greek war crimes

The article Greek war crimes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

very questionable neutrality. You seem to be pushing a point of view in violation of WP:NPOV

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Insanityclown1 (talk) 16:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greco-Turkish War (1919–1922), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkish. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:00, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Turkish-Georgian War (1921) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Turkish-Georgian War (1921) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turkish-Georgian War (1921) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HistoryofIran (talk) 18:03, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Hello, BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı. I noticed that your recent edit to Kadir Mısıroğlu added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 22:02, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. I wanted to put the photo on the Turkish Wikipedia article "Kadir Mısıroğlu". I do not know but there is a photo on the Kadir Mısıroğlu photo on the Turkish one BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı (talk) 10:04, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Please do more to bring a neutral point of view to your edits

Right now they have a blatantly nationalist point of view. This is not compatible with WP:NPOV. Insanityclown1 (talk) 02:19, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Hearing this from you weird. BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı (talk) 20:28, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

How am I a nationalist? I'm an American with no connections to the area. Insanityclown1 (talk) 20:41, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

July 24, 2024

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Insanityclown1 (talk) 22:59, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Okay BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı (talk) 07:32, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Eskişehir Clashes (1920)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Eskişehir Clashes (1920), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Okay, sorry for the mistake. BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı (talk) 20:28, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

NPOV – July 2024

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Operation Hawk. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Demetrios1993 (talk) 07:14, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Eskişehir clashes

The article Eskişehir clashes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

this does not seem to be a notable event and some of your sources flat out do not back up your claims.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

No problem but, why would someone deletes an article for a weird reason, i wonder accually. BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı (talk) 11:33, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Because your sources don’t say what you say they do. Insanityclown1 (talk) 18:03, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Hmmm, then what are they saying? I wonder🤔 BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı (talk) 18:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Also, I noticed that your edit history is fully about me. Why are you obsessed me so much? BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı (talk) 18:06, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

I'm flattered you think I actually care about you in the slightest. I'm just trying to prevent damage to Wikipedia. Insanityclown1 (talk) 18:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

I am not saying this. Your edit history says itself. Continue to deceive yourself :) BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı (talk) 18:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Ok. Considering I’ve been editing for longer than your account has existed, i think the only one deceiving themself is you. Insanityclown1 (talk) 18:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Nobody said that my account is existed before yours either. You are so obsessed me that you're getting annoyed that I'm trying to become an "Extended Confirmed User" (I've already been in fact, so, you can cry). BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı (talk) 18:19, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

“So! you can cry.” How childish. Your behaving like someone having a tantrum because they got caught with a hand in the cookie jar. Insanityclown1 (talk) 18:21, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Focusing on only a part of the subject rather than the main theme is usually the job of those who can't find an answer. BaharatlıCheetos2.0'ın devamı (talk) 18:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Until you can come up with a substantive response to the allegations levied against you at AN/I and SPI, I see no reason to continue this "enlightening" discussion. Insanityclown1 (talk) 18:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Greek war crimes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Greek war crimes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greek war crimes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

D.S. Lioness (talk) 17:44, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Java War (1741–1743)

added links pointing to Chinese, Dutch, Mataram and Tanjung

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for gaming the system to obtain extended confirmed status and then immediately jumping to edit contentious EC protected articles, despite several previous warnings and a block. You can request an unblock from mainspace once you have shown through talkpage discussions etc that you can comply with wikipedia's content policies and edit collaboratively..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Abecedare (talk) 21:17, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have recently made edits related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans. This is a standard message to inform you that Eastern Europe or the Balkans is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Abecedare (talk) 21:22, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rewandiz offensive

The article Rewandiz offensive has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

We can't even who commanded a major belligerent power in an allegedly major combat operation. The British would surely have something in their archives if this was anything notable. The sizes of the armies are unknown as well, which seems highly suspect.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Insanityclown1 (talk) 01:19, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tal Afar uprising

The article Tal Afar uprising has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't seem particularly notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Insanityclown1 (talk) 02:11, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Samsun clashes (1920)

The article Samsun clashes (1920) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of notability and unable to confirm veracity of the provided sources. Given the context of the article's creator, this article likely has very questionable neutrality.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Samsun clashes (1920) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samsun clashes (1920) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samsun clashes (1920) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Insanityclown1 (talk) 20:28, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Tal Afar uprising for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tal Afar uprising is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tal Afar uprising until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Insanityclown1 (talk) 20:33, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Battle of Derbent (1922) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Derbent (1922) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Derbent (1922) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Insanityclown1 (talk) 01:20, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Pontic uprising for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pontic uprising is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pontic uprising until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Insanityclown1 (talk) 18:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 00:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Al-Jazira Front moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Al-Jazira Front, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)