Regarding edits to Oromo Liberation Front

edit

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Bakakkaa! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule .+\.multiply\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 23:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Oromo Liberation Front. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. HalfShadow 17:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

The so called shadowbot aka TPLF agent what ever your name is, what is the hell mean "neutrality" when you let vandalized doccuments, put up distorted information and purely done for TPLF propoganda at instructiion of TPLF government. Let us c what the law refer to. Either you will remove this article at your will or will be subjected to court decision. Let us c you soon.

neutral point of view policy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bakakkaa (talkcontribs) 20:28, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

  Your recent edits could give editors of Wikipedia the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a genuine dispute with the Community or its members, please use dispute resolution. Also, you're sassing off a program. Stop it. It just makes you look silly. HalfShadow 22:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Wikipedia has a strict policy against legal threats. You have been blocked while your legal threats are outstanding. If you first clearly and explicitly rescind these legal threats, you may then place {{unblock|your reason here}} on this talk page to request unblocking. ··coelacan 22:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Compare with User:Hagos

edit

I suspect (and I doubt I'm the only one) that User:Hagos and User:Bakakkaa are the same user (along with the suspected sockpuppets of each account). At this point, however, I do not have a strong suspicion, as all the edits associated with Hagos and/or suspected sockpuppets seem to follow one distinct pattern, while those of Bakakkaa and/or suspected sockpuppets follow another. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:58, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply